Comprehensive evaluation of oculus pentacam in subclinical keratoconus and clinical keratoconus patients at different stages

Abstract: PURPOSE: To evaluate and identify the ability of the Oculus Pentacam parameters to distinguish subclinical keratoconus (SCKC) and clinical keratoconus (CKC) at different stages in normal eyes. METHODS: SCKC ( n = 28), KC Stage I ( n = 25), KC Stage II ( n = 40), KC Stage III ( n = 35), KC Stage IV ( n = 26), and normal eyes ( n = 46) were analyzed using the Oculus Pentacam HR. Comparisons between groups were assessed using Kruskal–Wallis and pairwise comparison Dunn tests. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine the predictive accuracy of each parameter, as described by the area under the curve (AUC). The AUCs were compared using the DeLong method. RESULTS: The SCKC group demonstrated a notable decrease in corneal thickness compared with the normal group. Index Surface Variance (ISV) had the highest ability to distinguish SCKC from normal (AUC: 0.897, sensitivity: 78.57%, specificity: 95.74%), followed by Ambrósio-Relational Thickness (ARTmax). ISV and index vertical asymmetry showed perfect discrimination ability to distinguish KC Stage I from normal eyes. Most of the Pentacam parameters had sufficient strength to differentiate between Stage II and normal eyes. CONCLUSION: The ISV from Pentacam was the most sensitive parameter for detecting SCKC, Stage I KC, and Stage II KC. Pentacam indices related to corneal thickness may be particularly valuable for identifying early signs of corneal ectasia when no abnormalities in topography are observed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/sjopt.sjopt_261_24
Primary Topic
Corneal surgery and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comprehensive evaluation of oculus pentacam in subclinical keratoconus and clinical keratoconus patients at different stages

Norsyariza Razak, Wan Haslina Wan Abdul Halim, Bariah Mohd Ali
Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology
Corneal surgery and disorders
article

Comprehensive evaluation of oculus pentacam in subclinical keratoconus and clinical keratoconus patients at different stages

Norsyariza Razak, Wan Haslina Wan Abdul Halim, Bariah Mohd Ali
article en

Abstract

Abstract: PURPOSE: To evaluate and identify the ability of the Oculus Pentacam parameters to distinguish subclinical keratoconus (SCKC) and clinical keratoconus (CKC) at different stages in normal eyes. METHODS: SCKC ( n = 28), KC Stage I ( n = 25), KC Stage II ( n = 40), KC Stage III ( n = 35), KC Stage IV ( n = 26), and normal eyes ( n = 46) were analyzed using the Oculus Pentacam HR. Comparisons between groups were assessed using Kruskal–Wallis and pairwise comparison Dunn tests. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine the predictive accuracy of each parameter, as described by the area under the curve (AUC). The AUCs were compared using the DeLong method. RESULTS: The SCKC group demonstrated a notable decrease in corneal thickness compared with the normal group. Index Surface Variance (ISV) had the highest ability to distinguish SCKC from normal (AUC: 0.897, sensitivity: 78.57%, specificity: 95.74%), followed by Ambrósio-Relational Thickness (ARTmax). ISV and index vertical asymmetry showed perfect discrimination ability to distinguish KC Stage I from normal eyes. Most of the Pentacam parameters had sufficient strength to differentiate between Stage II and normal eyes. CONCLUSION: The ISV from Pentacam was the most sensitive parameter for detecting SCKC, Stage I KC, and Stage II KC. Pentacam indices related to corneal thickness may be particularly valuable for identifying early signs of corneal ectasia when no abnormalities in topography are observed.

Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology
SUNY College of Optometry (US), National University of Malaysia (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Corneal surgery and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.