Legitimization of the Memory of the Great Patriotic War

The article is devoted to the study of the role of legislation in the construction of the official historical narrative of the Great Patriotic War, as expressed in memorial legislation. Based on the analysis of the form, content and meaning of normative legal acts dedicated to the memory of the Great Patriotic War, it is concluded that the legitimization of historical memory is associated with the desire of the state to articulate frames of historical memory that explicate social ideas about key individuals, events and symbols that are crucial for ensuring national security and social identification, not only in in historical retrospect, but also in relation to modern social reality. The memory of the Great Patriotic War, consolidating society, is the most important means of social identification and acts as a value standard of citizens' behavior, which has shown its effectiveness in the past. By constructing frames of historical memory, memorial legislation ensures not only the preservation of the image of the Great Patriotic War and its interpretation in accordance with the official historical narrative, but also its transmission to citizens and representation in commemorative practices that explicate the axiological intentionality of Russian politics. This creates a sense of belonging between the state and civil society in the process of perpetuating the memory of the Great Patriotic War. The author emphasizes that memorial legislation is not only a legal, but also a legitimate means of preserving, broadcasting and representing the memory of the war. On the one hand, it explicates the conventional image of the Great Patriotic War, formed in the memory of Russian society. On the other hand, it is intended to broadcast the official historical narrative to the neophytes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Prolog
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21639/2313-6715.2025.2.2.18-28.
Primary Topic
Eastern European Communism and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Legitimization of the Memory of the Great Patriotic War

А. В. Скоробогатов
Prolog
Eastern European Communism and Reforms
article

Legitimization of the Memory of the Great Patriotic War

А. В. Скоробогатов
article en

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of the role of legislation in the construction of the official historical narrative of the Great Patriotic War, as expressed in memorial legislation. Based on the analysis of the form, content and meaning of normative legal acts dedicated to the memory of the Great Patriotic War, it is concluded that the legitimization of historical memory is associated with the desire of the state to articulate frames of historical memory that explicate social ideas about key individuals, events and symbols that are crucial for ensuring national security and social identification, not only in in historical retrospect, but also in relation to modern social reality. The memory of the Great Patriotic War, consolidating society, is the most important means of social identification and acts as a value standard of citizens' behavior, which has shown its effectiveness in the past. By constructing frames of historical memory, memorial legislation ensures not only the preservation of the image of the Great Patriotic War and its interpretation in accordance with the official historical narrative, but also its transmission to citizens and representation in commemorative practices that explicate the axiological intentionality of Russian politics. This creates a sense of belonging between the state and civil society in the process of perpetuating the memory of the Great Patriotic War. The author emphasizes that memorial legislation is not only a legal, but also a legitimate means of preserving, broadcasting and representing the memory of the war. On the one hand, it explicates the conventional image of the Great Patriotic War, formed in the memory of Russian society. On the other hand, it is intended to broadcast the official historical narrative to the neophytes.

Prolog(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Eastern European Communism and Reforms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.