The Manifestation of “Transgredience” or The Cultural Principles of the Post-Soviet Art Diaspora of Kazakhstan

This article provides an analysis of tricksterism as both an ideological strategy and an aesthetic principle within the art practices of notable contemporary Kazakh artists of the late twentieth century, namely, Ziyakhan Shaigyldinov (Shay Ziya, 1950–2000), Sergey Maslov (1952–2002), and Vadim Ganzha (b. 1956). The author observes that post-Soviet tricksterism, which is still evident in the cultural landscape of the former Soviet republics, emerged as a natural response to the prevailing social conditions of the time. The article describes the distinctiveness of the emergence and evolution of tricksterism in Kazakhstan. It discusses how this phenomenon manifested in the post-Soviet era through contemporary art forms, which combined social commentary with the text-centric aesthetics typical of Soviet protest practices. This topic has not yet been the focus of any cultural anthropological analysis. The author delineates the fundamental characteristics of art tricksterism, encompassing protest ideology and the centrality of text and literature in the aesthetic structuring of artistic actions. In numerous respects, the artistic practices of the representatives of the movement chronologically align with the development of the post-avant-garde period and, most significantly, echo the aesthetics of postmodernism. For the first time, Kazakh artists employed a novel language to discuss time and their identity within the sociocultural practice of the country. In this language, the rhetoric of social expression gained prominence alongside the innovative and aesthetically sophisticated deconstruction of the Soviet linguistic framework. A notable aspect of the Kazakh tricksters’ art practice involved the parody of “state” texts, including party manifestos, official statements, and instructions. According to the author, among the various local manifestations of tricksterism in the post-Soviet realm, the contributions of Kazakh artists are the most distinguished by their originality, intermediality in their execution, and discernible predictive implications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quaestio Rossica
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2025.3.1012
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Global Political and Economic Relations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
34.09
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Manifestation of “Transgredience” or The Cultural Principles of the Post-Soviet Art Diaspora of Kazakhstan

Gazinur Gizdatov
4 citations
Quaestio Rossica
Global Political and Economic Relations
34.09
article

The Manifestation of “Transgredience” or The Cultural Principles of the Post-Soviet Art Diaspora of Kazakhstan

Gazinur Gizdatov
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This article provides an analysis of tricksterism as both an ideological strategy and an aesthetic principle within the art practices of notable contemporary Kazakh artists of the late twentieth century, namely, Ziyakhan Shaigyldinov (Shay Ziya, 1950–2000), Sergey Maslov (1952–2002), and Vadim Ganzha (b. 1956). The author observes that post-Soviet tricksterism, which is still evident in the cultural landscape of the former Soviet republics, emerged as a natural response to the prevailing social conditions of the time. The article describes the distinctiveness of the emergence and evolution of tricksterism in Kazakhstan. It discusses how this phenomenon manifested in the post-Soviet era through contemporary art forms, which combined social commentary with the text-centric aesthetics typical of Soviet protest practices. This topic has not yet been the focus of any cultural anthropological analysis. The author delineates the fundamental characteristics of art tricksterism, encompassing protest ideology and the centrality of text and literature in the aesthetic structuring of artistic actions. In numerous respects, the artistic practices of the representatives of the movement chronologically align with the development of the post-avant-garde period and, most significantly, echo the aesthetics of postmodernism. For the first time, Kazakh artists employed a novel language to discuss time and their identity within the sociocultural practice of the country. In this language, the rhetoric of social expression gained prominence alongside the innovative and aesthetically sophisticated deconstruction of the Soviet linguistic framework. A notable aspect of the Kazakh tricksters’ art practice involved the parody of “state” texts, including party manifestos, official statements, and instructions. According to the author, among the various local manifestations of tricksterism in the post-Soviet realm, the contributions of Kazakh artists are the most distinguished by their originality, intermediality in their execution, and discernible predictive implications.

Quaestio RossicaVol. 13(3)
Kazakh Ablai Khan University of International Relations and World Languages (KZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Global Political and Economic Relations
34.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.