An Unsuccessful Attempt at Presenting Political Struggle in the 5th Century Byzantium

The monograph under review is an attempt to reveal the content and meaning of one of the most notable phenomena in the Byzantine political struggle of the 450s to the 470s, the rise and collapse of the clan headed by magister militum Aspar. The review shows that the author of the monograph, presenting an extensive factual history of the events as presented by the sources, mostly narrative ones, is short of fully overcoming their bias. The attempt to interpret the essence of the political regime of that time as a “ceremonial” rule is utterly unsatisfactory and in addition, this definition is explained rather incorrectly. The researcher considers inadequately the institutional environment in which the struggle unfolded, and in effect does not analyze the social situation. Thus, the specific late-Antique features of Early Byzantium structuring the fate of Aspar and his opponents and allies are paid no attention in the book.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Istoriya
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18254/s207987840035463-8
Primary Topic
Byzantine Studies and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Unsuccessful Attempt at Presenting Political Struggle in the 5th Century Byzantium

А. С. Козлов
Istoriya
Byzantine Studies and History
article

An Unsuccessful Attempt at Presenting Political Struggle in the 5th Century Byzantium

А. С. Козлов
article en

Abstract

The monograph under review is an attempt to reveal the content and meaning of one of the most notable phenomena in the Byzantine political struggle of the 450s to the 470s, the rise and collapse of the clan headed by magister militum Aspar. The review shows that the author of the monograph, presenting an extensive factual history of the events as presented by the sources, mostly narrative ones, is short of fully overcoming their bias. The attempt to interpret the essence of the political regime of that time as a “ceremonial” rule is utterly unsatisfactory and in addition, this definition is explained rather incorrectly. The researcher considers inadequately the institutional environment in which the struggle unfolded, and in effect does not analyze the social situation. Thus, the specific late-Antique features of Early Byzantium structuring the fate of Aspar and his opponents and allies are paid no attention in the book.

IstoriyaVol. 16(4 (150))
Ural Federal University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Byzantine Studies and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.