Mechanical and Antimicrobial Evaluation of Chitosan-Coated Elastomeric Orthodontic Modules

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Orthodontic appliances disrupt oral biofilm homeostasis, leading to an increase in plaque and disease risk. Elastomeric modules (EMs) promote bacterial growth due to their material composition. Surface coatings have been developed to reduce bacterial colonization. We evaluated the mechanical, antimicrobial, and cell viability properties of a chitosan coating for EMs. <b>Methods</b>: EMs were coated with chitosan (CS) and chitosan-glutaraldehyde (CS-GTA) to assess antimicrobial and cell viability. Uncoated EMs were used as a control. These surface-coated modules were characterized and analyzed with Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) and Raman spectroscopy, and tensile testing. Antibacterial activity was assessed by colony-forming units (CFU) counts after incubation. Cell viability was tested with gingival fibroblasts using the MTT assay. ANOVA, Tukey, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for statistical analysis. <b>Results</b>: Raman spectra of the chitosan coatings showed characteristic molecular vibration bands. ANOVA revealed a significant difference in mechanical properties between the materials and between the control and the CS-GTA groups, confirmed by the Tukey post hoc test. No significant difference was observed between the groups in the Yield Stress test. All the coated groups showed reduced CFU counts in the antibacterial assay. The average cell viability of the coated groups was 85% and 89%. <b>Conclusions</b>: We synthesized CS and GTA-cross-linked chitosan coatings. The coatings did not affect the mechanical properties of the elastomeric modules. The chitosan and glutaraldehyde-cross-linked CS coatings inhibited bacterial growth. No significant differences were observed in antibacterial activity between the CS and the GTA-crosslinked chitosan coatings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dentistry Journal
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13100447
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.68
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mechanical and Antimicrobial Evaluation of Chitosan-Coated Elastomeric Orthodontic Modules

Fernando Javier Aguilar‐Pérez, Martha Gabriela Chuc-Gamboa, José Rubén Herrera-Atoche, Arturo Abraham Cienfuegos-Sarmiento et al.
1 citations
Dentistry Journal
Dental materials and restorations
1.68
article

Mechanical and Antimicrobial Evaluation of Chitosan-Coated Elastomeric Orthodontic Modules

Fernando Javier Aguilar‐Pérez, Martha Gabriela Chuc-Gamboa, José Rubén Herrera-Atoche, Arturo Abraham Cienfuegos-Sarmiento, Lucía Gabriela Beltrán-Novelo, Myriam Angélica De la Garza-Ramos, Jacqueline Adelina Rodríguez‐Chávez, Juan Valerio Cauich‐Rodríguez
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Orthodontic appliances disrupt oral biofilm homeostasis, leading to an increase in plaque and disease risk. Elastomeric modules (EMs) promote bacterial growth due to their material composition. Surface coatings have been developed to reduce bacterial colonization. We evaluated the mechanical, antimicrobial, and cell viability properties of a chitosan coating for EMs. <b>Methods</b>: EMs were coated with chitosan (CS) and chitosan-glutaraldehyde (CS-GTA) to assess antimicrobial and cell viability. Uncoated EMs were used as a control. These surface-coated modules were characterized and analyzed with Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) and Raman spectroscopy, and tensile testing. Antibacterial activity was assessed by colony-forming units (CFU) counts after incubation. Cell viability was tested with gingival fibroblasts using the MTT assay. ANOVA, Tukey, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for statistical analysis. <b>Results</b>: Raman spectra of the chitosan coatings showed characteristic molecular vibration bands. ANOVA revealed a significant difference in mechanical properties between the materials and between the control and the CS-GTA groups, confirmed by the Tukey post hoc test. No significant difference was observed between the groups in the Yield Stress test. All the coated groups showed reduced CFU counts in the antibacterial assay. The average cell viability of the coated groups was 85% and 89%. <b>Conclusions</b>: We synthesized CS and GTA-cross-linked chitosan coatings. The coatings did not affect the mechanical properties of the elastomeric modules. The chitosan and glutaraldehyde-cross-linked CS coatings inhibited bacterial growth. No significant differences were observed in antibacterial activity between the CS and the GTA-crosslinked chitosan coatings.

Dentistry JournalVol. 13(10)
Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León (MX), Universidad de Guadalajara (MX), Secretaría de Investigación, Innovación y Educación Superior (MX), Autonomous University of Yucatán (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Dental materials and restorations
1.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.