The Peninsular War Evaluated by Authors of the English Periodical “The Quarterly Review”. 1809—1814

The age of the French Revolutionary Wars and Napoleonic Wars was a time of great upheaval, causing profound social and political changes in Europe. Part of this conflict was the Peninsular War 1808—1814, in which the British armed forces took part. The Spanish struggle for their freedom was accompanied by widespread popular resistance, the guerrilla warfare, as well as significant political transformations. All this attracted the attention of the British public and generated discussions among the political elites of the country. Debates about the course of the conflict, its prospects and the need for assistance from the United Kingdom to the rebellious Spaniards were reflected in the pages of the periodical press. Among the influential periodicals whose authors spoke out on these issues was The Quarterly Review, a literary and political review founded in London in 1809. Among its reviewers were prominent literary figures and politicians such as R. Southey, W. Scott, J. Ellis, J. Barrow, J. W. Crocker and others. One of the main roles in the creation and development of the journal was played by the publicist and Tory politician J. Canning, who served as the Foreign Secretary in 1807—1809. Reviewing literary novelties in their articles, critics turned to the issues of the current conflict in the Pyrenees. They argued about the nature of the war, the peculiarities of military operations and the role of local authorities in resisting the French invaders. They were also interested in the role of popular resistance in the liberation of the country. In describing current events, they often referred to analogies from the Spanish past, which made it possible to fit them into a broad historical context. Reflections on the course of the military confrontation became not only a statement of one's position on the nature of the conflict, but also a response to political opponents, which also influenced the opinions that existed in British society about the war on the Peninsula.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Istoriya
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18254/s207987840035628-9
Primary Topic
Travel Writing and Literature
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Peninsular War Evaluated by Authors of the English Periodical “The Quarterly Review”. 1809—1814

Vladimir Eremin
Istoriya
Travel Writing and Literature
article

The Peninsular War Evaluated by Authors of the English Periodical “The Quarterly Review”. 1809—1814

Vladimir Eremin
article en

Abstract

The age of the French Revolutionary Wars and Napoleonic Wars was a time of great upheaval, causing profound social and political changes in Europe. Part of this conflict was the Peninsular War 1808—1814, in which the British armed forces took part. The Spanish struggle for their freedom was accompanied by widespread popular resistance, the guerrilla warfare, as well as significant political transformations. All this attracted the attention of the British public and generated discussions among the political elites of the country. Debates about the course of the conflict, its prospects and the need for assistance from the United Kingdom to the rebellious Spaniards were reflected in the pages of the periodical press. Among the influential periodicals whose authors spoke out on these issues was The Quarterly Review, a literary and political review founded in London in 1809. Among its reviewers were prominent literary figures and politicians such as R. Southey, W. Scott, J. Ellis, J. Barrow, J. W. Crocker and others. One of the main roles in the creation and development of the journal was played by the publicist and Tory politician J. Canning, who served as the Foreign Secretary in 1807—1809. Reviewing literary novelties in their articles, critics turned to the issues of the current conflict in the Pyrenees. They argued about the nature of the war, the peculiarities of military operations and the role of local authorities in resisting the French invaders. They were also interested in the role of popular resistance in the liberation of the country. In describing current events, they often referred to analogies from the Spanish past, which made it possible to fit them into a broad historical context. Reflections on the course of the military confrontation became not only a statement of one's position on the nature of the conflict, but also a response to political opponents, which also influenced the opinions that existed in British society about the war on the Peninsula.

IstoriyaVol. 16(4 (150))
Institute of World History (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Travel Writing and Literature
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Peninsular War Evaluated by Authors of the English Periodical “The Quarterly Review”. 1809—1814 — Vladimir Eremin · Istoriya (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS