Siege of Constantinople in 1394—1402 According Slavonic Sources

The article is devoted to the history of the Ottoman siege of Constantinople in 1394—1402, which became the longest in the entire history of the Byzantine capital. Historians reconstruct these events mainly based on Byzantine and Western European (Venetian, French) sources. However, the Bulgarian and Russian chronicles contain unique information that is not found in other sources. Thus, the Russian chronicles reflect the fact that the pretender to the Byzantine throne John VII Palaiologos participated in the siege on the side of the Ottomans in 1395, trying to establish himself in Constantinople with the help of the Sultan's army. Emperor Manuel II Palaiologos, whose army consisted not only of Greeks, but also of Italians (“fryazi”), could repel this attack. The Russian chronicles mentioned the material assistance that Russian princes collected for the besieged Constantinople. The Bulgarian Chronicle reports that the Emperor attempted to buy off the Ottomans, but his offer was rejected by the Sultan. The same source confirms the fact that a French detachment participated in the defense of the city, something that the Byzantine authors are silent about. Thus, some very important details of the history of the siege, not mentioned in other documents, were reflected in the Slavonic sources.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Istoriya
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18254/s207987840035718-8
Primary Topic
Byzantine Studies and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Siege of Constantinople in 1394—1402 According Slavonic Sources

Tatiana Kushch
Istoriya
Byzantine Studies and History
article

Siege of Constantinople in 1394—1402 According Slavonic Sources

Tatiana Kushch
article en

Abstract

The article is devoted to the history of the Ottoman siege of Constantinople in 1394—1402, which became the longest in the entire history of the Byzantine capital. Historians reconstruct these events mainly based on Byzantine and Western European (Venetian, French) sources. However, the Bulgarian and Russian chronicles contain unique information that is not found in other sources. Thus, the Russian chronicles reflect the fact that the pretender to the Byzantine throne John VII Palaiologos participated in the siege on the side of the Ottomans in 1395, trying to establish himself in Constantinople with the help of the Sultan's army. Emperor Manuel II Palaiologos, whose army consisted not only of Greeks, but also of Italians (“fryazi”), could repel this attack. The Russian chronicles mentioned the material assistance that Russian princes collected for the besieged Constantinople. The Bulgarian Chronicle reports that the Emperor attempted to buy off the Ottomans, but his offer was rejected by the Sultan. The same source confirms the fact that a French detachment participated in the defense of the city, something that the Byzantine authors are silent about. Thus, some very important details of the history of the siege, not mentioned in other documents, were reflected in the Slavonic sources.

IstoriyaVol. 16(4 (150))
Institute of World History (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Byzantine Studies and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.