Solidification Microstructure and Secondary-Phase Precipitation Behavior of 310S Austenitic Stainless Steel

In this study, the solidification behavior of 310S stainless steel was systematically investigated by combining high-temperature confocal laser scanning microscopy (HT-CLSM), microstructural characterization, and thermodynamic calculations. The focus was on the formation and transformation of ferrite, secondary-phase precipitation, and elemental segregation behavior, with comparisons made with 304 stainless steel. The effects of an Al addition and cooling rate were also explored. The results show that the solidification sequence of 310S stainless steel is L → L + γ → L + γ + δ → δ + γ, in which austenite nucleates early and grows rapidly, followed by the precipitation of a small amount of δ-ferrite in the later stages of solidification. In contrast, 304 stainless steel solidifies according to L → L + δ → L + δ + γ → δ + γ, with a rapid δ → γ transformation occurring after solidification. Compared with 304, 310S stainless steel exhibits a reduced ferrite fraction and a significantly increased σ phase content. The σ phase primarily precipitates directly from δ-ferrite (δ → σ), while M23C6 preferentially forms at grain boundaries and δ/γ interfaces, where δ-ferrite not only provides fast diffusion pathways for Cr but also nucleation sites. The solidification segregation sequence in 310S stainless steel is Cr > Ni > Fe, with Cr and Ni showing positive segregation and Fe showing negative segregation. The addition of Al does not alter the solidification mode of 310S stainless steel but refines austenite grains, reduces interdendritic solute enrichment, decreases segregation, lowers both the size and fraction of ferrite, and suppresses the precipitation of σ and M23C6 phases. This effect is mainly attributed to the reduction of δ/γ interfaces, which weakens the preferred nucleation sites for M23C6. Increasing the cooling rate enhances non-equilibrium solute segregation, promotes ferrite formation, inhibits the δ → γ transformation, and ultimately retains more ferrite; the intensified segregation further accelerates the δ → σ transformation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Metals
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/met15101091
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Metallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Solidification Microstructure and Secondary-Phase Precipitation Behavior of 310S Austenitic Stainless Steel

Shaoguang Yang, Aimin Zhao, Jianhua Wei, Kuo Cao et al.
1 citations
Metals
Metallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics
0.71
article

Solidification Microstructure and Secondary-Phase Precipitation Behavior of 310S Austenitic Stainless Steel

Shaoguang Yang, Aimin Zhao, Jianhua Wei, Kuo Cao, Di Wang, Shaojun Qiu, Jun Xiao
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this study, the solidification behavior of 310S stainless steel was systematically investigated by combining high-temperature confocal laser scanning microscopy (HT-CLSM), microstructural characterization, and thermodynamic calculations. The focus was on the formation and transformation of ferrite, secondary-phase precipitation, and elemental segregation behavior, with comparisons made with 304 stainless steel. The effects of an Al addition and cooling rate were also explored. The results show that the solidification sequence of 310S stainless steel is L → L + γ → L + γ + δ → δ + γ, in which austenite nucleates early and grows rapidly, followed by the precipitation of a small amount of δ-ferrite in the later stages of solidification. In contrast, 304 stainless steel solidifies according to L → L + δ → L + δ + γ → δ + γ, with a rapid δ → γ transformation occurring after solidification. Compared with 304, 310S stainless steel exhibits a reduced ferrite fraction and a significantly increased σ phase content. The σ phase primarily precipitates directly from δ-ferrite (δ → σ), while M23C6 preferentially forms at grain boundaries and δ/γ interfaces, where δ-ferrite not only provides fast diffusion pathways for Cr but also nucleation sites. The solidification segregation sequence in 310S stainless steel is Cr > Ni > Fe, with Cr and Ni showing positive segregation and Fe showing negative segregation. The addition of Al does not alter the solidification mode of 310S stainless steel but refines austenite grains, reduces interdendritic solute enrichment, decreases segregation, lowers both the size and fraction of ferrite, and suppresses the precipitation of σ and M23C6 phases. This effect is mainly attributed to the reduction of δ/γ interfaces, which weakens the preferred nucleation sites for M23C6. Increasing the cooling rate enhances non-equilibrium solute segregation, promotes ferrite formation, inhibits the δ → γ transformation, and ultimately retains more ferrite; the intensified segregation further accelerates the δ → σ transformation.

MetalsVol. 15(10)
University of Science and Technology Beijing (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Metallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics
0.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.