Analysis of Control Factors for Sensitivity of Coalbed Methane Reservoirs

Formation damage sensitivity is a primary constraint on productivity in coalbed methane (CBM) reservoirs. Conventional experimental methods, which often employ crushed or plug coal samples, disrupt the natural fracture network, thereby overestimating matrix damage and underestimating fracture-related damage. In this study, synchronous comparative experiments were conducted using raw coal and briquette coal cores, integrated with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) analyses to characterize coal composition and pore structure. This approach elucidates the underlying mechanisms controlling reservoir sensitivity. The main findings are as follows: The dual-sample comparative system reveals substantial deviations in traditional experimental assessments. Due to post-dissolution compaction, briquette coal samples overestimate acid sensitivity while underestimating water sensitivity. Stress sensitivity is primarily attributed to the irreversible compression of natural fractures. Differences in acid sensitivity are governed by structural integrity: mineral dissolution leads to collapse in briquette coal, whereas fractures help maintain stability in raw coal. Raw coal exhibits a lower critical flow rate for velocity sensitivity and undergoes significant water sensitivity damage below 1 MPa. Both sample types show weak alkaline sensitivity, with damage acceleration observed within the pH range of 7 to 10.