Artificial Intelligence and International Rules in Cyberspace: A Comparative Knowledge-Mapping Analysis

Considering the new technologies, trends, and geopolitical challenges brought about by the globalization of the Internet, research on international rules in cyberspace holds theoretical urgency, practical significance, and provides guidance for real-world applications. A comparative analysis of relevant papers on the international governance of cyberspace between 1999 and 2020 was conducted using the knowledge mapping tool CiteSpace in Chinese and English databases. The analysis revealed that Chinese research exhibits a stronger focus on national policies, with distinct characteristics at different stages of research. In contrast, English literature demonstrates a clear delineation of the theoretical foundation and maintains a continuous and in-depth exploration of foundational topics. While the field of communication in Chinese has a significantly higher quantity of research compared to English, there exists a structural gap between this field and its foundational theories. In the process of a paradigm shift, it is crucial to emphasize Chinese academic perspectives in this field, pay attention to both domestic and international foundational knowledge and emerging trends, and strengthen theoretical innovation and academic community-building.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/info16100842
Primary Topic
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence and International Rules in Cyberspace: A Comparative Knowledge-Mapping Analysis

Yajuan Liu, Zhi Li
Information
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
article

Artificial Intelligence and International Rules in Cyberspace: A Comparative Knowledge-Mapping Analysis

Yajuan Liu, Zhi Li
article en

Abstract

Considering the new technologies, trends, and geopolitical challenges brought about by the globalization of the Internet, research on international rules in cyberspace holds theoretical urgency, practical significance, and provides guidance for real-world applications. A comparative analysis of relevant papers on the international governance of cyberspace between 1999 and 2020 was conducted using the knowledge mapping tool CiteSpace in Chinese and English databases. The analysis revealed that Chinese research exhibits a stronger focus on national policies, with distinct characteristics at different stages of research. In contrast, English literature demonstrates a clear delineation of the theoretical foundation and maintains a continuous and in-depth exploration of foundational topics. While the field of communication in Chinese has a significantly higher quantity of research compared to English, there exists a structural gap between this field and its foundational theories. In the process of a paradigm shift, it is crucial to emphasize Chinese academic perspectives in this field, pay attention to both domestic and international foundational knowledge and emerging trends, and strengthen theoretical innovation and academic community-building.

InformationVol. 16(10)
Ningbo University of Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Artificial Intelligence and International Rules in Cyberspace: A Comparative Knowledge-Mapping Analysis — Yajuan Liu, Zhi Li · Information (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS