Whole-Blood Cellular Responses: A Promising Indicator of SARS-CoV-2 Immunity Compared to Serology

<b>Background:</b> Currently available immunological tests for SARS-CoV-2 assess only antibody responses. Despite the growing evidence that T cells play a crucial role in protection, especially against emerging viral variants, no routine test is available to determine T cell immunity. The prognostic value of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies for determining whether individuals are immune and protected against disease remains uncertain. This is in part due to the following: (a) specificity and limitations such as the sensitivity of antibody tests, and (b) the lack of correlation between antibody titers (quantity) and the antiviral function of antibodies (quality). Approximately a quarter of SARS-CoV-2-infected patients with symptoms fail to show seroconversion in serological assays. <b>Methods</b>: The current report describes the development and application of a whole-blood-based assay to detect previous exposure to SARS-CoV-2. Whole blood is stimulated with SARS-CoV-2-derived peptides identified during assay development and stimulation-induced cytokines quantified using a multiplex testing platform. The resulting cytokine profiles are generated using computational tools to identify previous exposure to the virus. <b>Results</b>: The application of the assay revealed a lack of self-awareness of individuals' COVID-19 infection history and demonstrated the value of this new assay to assess the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 exposure history and immunity in populations. <b>Conclusions</b>: Positive responses in this assay can facilitate the identification of underlying causes of unexplained symptoms and provide clinically actionable insights for healthcare applications, including in the continued conundrum of post-acute sequela of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC or "long COVID"), for which both diagnosis and management remain challenging.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14196889
Primary Topic
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Whole-Blood Cellular Responses: A Promising Indicator of SARS-CoV-2 Immunity Compared to Serology

Rupsa C. Boelig, Jeffrey R. Currier, Margaret C. Costanzo, Elizabeth H. Duncan et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
article

Whole-Blood Cellular Responses: A Promising Indicator of SARS-CoV-2 Immunity Compared to Serology

Rupsa C. Boelig, Jeffrey R. Currier, Margaret C. Costanzo, Elizabeth H. Duncan, Lucas Zhou, Elke S. Bergmann‐Leitner
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Currently available immunological tests for SARS-CoV-2 assess only antibody responses. Despite the growing evidence that T cells play a crucial role in protection, especially against emerging viral variants, no routine test is available to determine T cell immunity. The prognostic value of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies for determining whether individuals are immune and protected against disease remains uncertain. This is in part due to the following: (a) specificity and limitations such as the sensitivity of antibody tests, and (b) the lack of correlation between antibody titers (quantity) and the antiviral function of antibodies (quality). Approximately a quarter of SARS-CoV-2-infected patients with symptoms fail to show seroconversion in serological assays. <b>Methods</b>: The current report describes the development and application of a whole-blood-based assay to detect previous exposure to SARS-CoV-2. Whole blood is stimulated with SARS-CoV-2-derived peptides identified during assay development and stimulation-induced cytokines quantified using a multiplex testing platform. The resulting cytokine profiles are generated using computational tools to identify previous exposure to the virus. <b>Results</b>: The application of the assay revealed a lack of self-awareness of individuals' COVID-19 infection history and demonstrated the value of this new assay to assess the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 exposure history and immunity in populations. <b>Conclusions</b>: Positive responses in this assay can facilitate the identification of underlying causes of unexplained symptoms and provide clinically actionable insights for healthcare applications, including in the continued conundrum of post-acute sequela of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC or "long COVID"), for which both diagnosis and management remain challenging.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(19)
Thomas Jefferson University (US), Thomas Jefferson University Hospital (US), Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.