Impact of Coated Phosphorus Fertilizers and Application Methods on Soil Fertility, Yield, and Ionic Regulation of Common Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Grown in Saline Soil

Salinity is a major limitation on common bean productivity, while phosphorus in many soils is often immobilized, limiting its availability to plants. This study investigated the effects of coated and uncoated superphosphate fertilizers, applied at different rates and using distinct methods, on soil properties, plant growth, and ion regulation in common beans grown in saline soil over two seasons (2023–2024). Treatments combined two fertilizer types (coated with potassium sulfate and uncoated), two P rates (360 and 480 kg/ha), and two application methods: (1) conventional application, broadcasting followed by plowing to 30 cm depth during soil preparation; (2) surface application, broadcasting without incorporation. Six treatments were applied: T1: 360 kg/ha of uncoated superphosphate (conventional method); T2: 480 kg/ha of uncoated superphosphate (conventional method); T3: 360 kg/ha of coated superphosphate (conventional method); T4: 480 kg/ha of coated superphosphate (conventional method); T5: 360 kg/ha of coated superphosphate (surface method); and T6: 480 kg/ha of coated superphosphate (surface method). The results demonstrated that soil pH was unaffected across treatments. However, T4 and T6 significantly improved nutrient availability (N, P, and K), biomass, grain yield, and seed nutritional quality (protein, P, K, and Ca). Despite increased soil EC, these treatments enhanced ionic balance (higher K/Na and Ca/Na ratios) indicating improved stress tolerance. Importantly, T3 (360 kg/ha coated) performed comparably to T2 (480 kg/ha uncoated), suggesting that coated superphosphate at lower rates can reduce input costs without compromising yield. These results demonstrate the agronomic and environmental benefits of coated superphosphate, particularly under saline conditions, through enhanced nutrient use efficiency and improved crop performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Crops
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/crops5050068
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.19

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Coated Phosphorus Fertilizers and Application Methods on Soil Fertility, Yield, and Ionic Regulation of Common Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Grown in Saline Soil

Tamer H. Khalifa, Sara A. El-Shabasy, T. M. El-Zehery, Alaa El-Dein Omara
1 citations
Crops
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
1.19
article

Impact of Coated Phosphorus Fertilizers and Application Methods on Soil Fertility, Yield, and Ionic Regulation of Common Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Grown in Saline Soil

Tamer H. Khalifa, Sara A. El-Shabasy, T. M. El-Zehery, Alaa El-Dein Omara
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Salinity is a major limitation on common bean productivity, while phosphorus in many soils is often immobilized, limiting its availability to plants. This study investigated the effects of coated and uncoated superphosphate fertilizers, applied at different rates and using distinct methods, on soil properties, plant growth, and ion regulation in common beans grown in saline soil over two seasons (2023–2024). Treatments combined two fertilizer types (coated with potassium sulfate and uncoated), two P rates (360 and 480 kg/ha), and two application methods: (1) conventional application, broadcasting followed by plowing to 30 cm depth during soil preparation; (2) surface application, broadcasting without incorporation. Six treatments were applied: T1: 360 kg/ha of uncoated superphosphate (conventional method); T2: 480 kg/ha of uncoated superphosphate (conventional method); T3: 360 kg/ha of coated superphosphate (conventional method); T4: 480 kg/ha of coated superphosphate (conventional method); T5: 360 kg/ha of coated superphosphate (surface method); and T6: 480 kg/ha of coated superphosphate (surface method). The results demonstrated that soil pH was unaffected across treatments. However, T4 and T6 significantly improved nutrient availability (N, P, and K), biomass, grain yield, and seed nutritional quality (protein, P, K, and Ca). Despite increased soil EC, these treatments enhanced ionic balance (higher K/Na and Ca/Na ratios) indicating improved stress tolerance. Importantly, T3 (360 kg/ha coated) performed comparably to T2 (480 kg/ha uncoated), suggesting that coated superphosphate at lower rates can reduce input costs without compromising yield. These results demonstrate the agronomic and environmental benefits of coated superphosphate, particularly under saline conditions, through enhanced nutrient use efficiency and improved crop performance.

CropsVol. 5(5)
Mansoura University (EG), Agricultural Research Center (EG)
Mansoura University
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
1.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.