Application of AI for Oil Price Forecasting

This paper examines methods for forecasting oil prices, comparing traditional autoregressive models (ARIMA, SARIMAX) with machine learning approaches (LSTM). The target variable is the price of WTI crude oil. The dataset covers 2015–2019 and includes both WTI price data and a set of exogenous variables: the Wilshire 5000, Dow Jones, and DXY indices; the Baltic Dirty Tanker Index (BDTI); the Brent–WTI price spread; volumes of crude oil produced and refined in the US; the number of active drilling rigs; US crude oil inventories; US petroleum product consumption; US net oil imports; and the number of days US crude oil inventories can cover demand, excluding the strategic petroleum reserve. Forecasts were generated over a five-day horizon. The results indicate that machine learning outperforms autoregressive models. The LSTM model incorporating the Dow Jones index as an exogenous variable showed the best performance (RMSE: 1.5). Autoregressive models performed less effectively, with RMSE values of 1.668 for ARIMA and 1.51 for SARIMAX. Even the LSTM model without exogenous variables (RMSE: 1.51) outperformed ARIMA, underscoring the relative advantage of machine learning in short-term oil price forecasting.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
AlterEconomics
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31063/altereconomics/2025.22-3.6
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Stock Market Forecasting Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Application of AI for Oil Price Forecasting

Варвара Назарова, Boris A. Lodiagin, Alexander Kruglov, F. A. Kruglov
1 citations
AlterEconomics
Stock Market Forecasting Methods
2.11
article

Application of AI for Oil Price Forecasting

Варвара Назарова, Boris A. Lodiagin, Alexander Kruglov, F. A. Kruglov
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper examines methods for forecasting oil prices, comparing traditional autoregressive models (ARIMA, SARIMAX) with machine learning approaches (LSTM). The target variable is the price of WTI crude oil. The dataset covers 2015–2019 and includes both WTI price data and a set of exogenous variables: the Wilshire 5000, Dow Jones, and DXY indices; the Baltic Dirty Tanker Index (BDTI); the Brent–WTI price spread; volumes of crude oil produced and refined in the US; the number of active drilling rigs; US crude oil inventories; US petroleum product consumption; US net oil imports; and the number of days US crude oil inventories can cover demand, excluding the strategic petroleum reserve. Forecasts were generated over a five-day horizon. The results indicate that machine learning outperforms autoregressive models. The LSTM model incorporating the Dow Jones index as an exogenous variable showed the best performance (RMSE: 1.5). Autoregressive models performed less effectively, with RMSE values of 1.668 for ARIMA and 1.51 for SARIMAX. Even the LSTM model without exogenous variables (RMSE: 1.51) outperformed ARIMA, underscoring the relative advantage of machine learning in short-term oil price forecasting.

AlterEconomicsVol. 22(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Stock Market Forecasting Methods
2.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Application of AI for Oil Price Forecasting — Варвара Назарова, Boris A. Lodiagin, et al. · AlterEconomics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS