Comparative Diagnostic Performance of Stewart Versus Henderson-Hasselbalch Methods for Acid-Base Disorders in Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective Observational Study

Background: Acid-base disorders are prevalent in critically ill patients, but traditional Henderson-Hasselbalch analysis may miss complex disorders. The Stewart physicochemical approach offers potentially superior diagnostic accuracy. Objective: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of Henderson-Hasselbalch versus Stewart methods for detecting acid-base disorders in hospitalized patients and assess their prognostic implications. Methods: This 11-month prospective observational study included 70 consecutive patients with arterial blood gas analysis from intensive care and pulmonology departments at Laghouat Mixed Hospital, Algeria (June 2024 - April 2025). Acid-base disorders were classified as simple, mixed, or complex using both methods by two independent reviewers. The primary outcome was diagnostic concordance between methods; secondary outcomes included mortality prediction and clinical correlations. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using Cohen's kappa. Results: Among 258 hospitalized patients, 70 (27.1%, 95% CI: 21.9%-32.8%) had acid-base disorders requiring blood gas analysis. The Stewart method identified significantly more disorders than Henderson-Hasselbalch (70 vs 23 disorders, p<0.001). Complex disorders predominated (47.1%), followed by mixed disorders (42.9%). Inter-rater agreement was excellent for Stewart method (κ=0.92) and moderate for Henderson-Hasselbalch (κ=0.58). Metabolic acidosis was associated with highest mortality (78.9% vs 45.1% for other disorders, p=0.012). A prognostic score incorporating disorder type, service, and base excess achieved good discrimination (AUC=0.812). Conclusions: The Stewart method identifies significantly more acid-base disorders than traditional Henderson-Hasselbalch analysis, particularly complex disorders. However, the clinical significance of this increased detection requires validation through interventional studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Studies
Published
2025-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62225/2583049x.2025.5.5.4988
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Renal function and acid-base balance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Diagnostic Performance of Stewart Versus Henderson-Hasselbalch Methods for Acid-Base Disorders in Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective Observational Study

Boubir Walid
1 citations
International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Studies
Renal function and acid-base balance
1.43
article

Comparative Diagnostic Performance of Stewart Versus Henderson-Hasselbalch Methods for Acid-Base Disorders in Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective Observational Study

Boubir Walid
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background: Acid-base disorders are prevalent in critically ill patients, but traditional Henderson-Hasselbalch analysis may miss complex disorders. The Stewart physicochemical approach offers potentially superior diagnostic accuracy. Objective: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of Henderson-Hasselbalch versus Stewart methods for detecting acid-base disorders in hospitalized patients and assess their prognostic implications. Methods: This 11-month prospective observational study included 70 consecutive patients with arterial blood gas analysis from intensive care and pulmonology departments at Laghouat Mixed Hospital, Algeria (June 2024 - April 2025). Acid-base disorders were classified as simple, mixed, or complex using both methods by two independent reviewers. The primary outcome was diagnostic concordance between methods; secondary outcomes included mortality prediction and clinical correlations. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using Cohen's kappa. Results: Among 258 hospitalized patients, 70 (27.1%, 95% CI: 21.9%-32.8%) had acid-base disorders requiring blood gas analysis. The Stewart method identified significantly more disorders than Henderson-Hasselbalch (70 vs 23 disorders, p<0.001). Complex disorders predominated (47.1%), followed by mixed disorders (42.9%). Inter-rater agreement was excellent for Stewart method (κ=0.92) and moderate for Henderson-Hasselbalch (κ=0.58). Metabolic acidosis was associated with highest mortality (78.9% vs 45.1% for other disorders, p=0.012). A prognostic score incorporating disorder type, service, and base excess achieved good discrimination (AUC=0.812). Conclusions: The Stewart method identifies significantly more acid-base disorders than traditional Henderson-Hasselbalch analysis, particularly complex disorders. However, the clinical significance of this increased detection requires validation through interventional studies.

International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and StudiesVol. 5(5)
Amar Telidji University of Laghouat (DZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Renal function and acid-base balance
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Diagnostic Performance of Stewart Versus Henderson-Hasselbalch Methods for Acid-Base Disorders in Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective Observational Study — Boubir Walid · International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS