Beyond QSARs: Quantitative Knowledge–Activity Relationships (QKARs) for enhanced drug toxicity prediction

Computational toxicology plays an important role in risk assessment and drug safety. The field has been traditionally dominated by Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (QSARs), which predict toxicological effects based solely on chemical structure. Although QSARs have achieved successes, their structure reliance limits drug toxicity predictions, where small structural modifications may cause major toxicity changes. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI), especially text embedding and generative AI, provide an opportunity to enhance toxicity predictions by leveraging broader chemical knowledge and its integration with structural data. In this study, we propose a novel framework, Quantitative Knowledge-Activity Relationships (QKARs), which predicts toxicity using domain-specific knowledge. We developed QKAR models for two drug toxicity endpoints, drug-induced liver injury (DILI) and drug-induced cardiotoxicity (DICT), using three different knowledge representations with varying levels of knowledge. The representations based on comprehensive knowledge of the drugs yielded better prediction than those with simpler knowledge. Five machine learning algorithms of distinct complexity were applied in QKAR models, and we observed little association between model complexity and performance. Further, we evaluated QKARs against QSARs on the same endpoints using identical datasets. We found that QKARs consistently outperformed QSARs for DILI and DICT. Notably, QKARs demonstrated better capability than QSARs in differentiating drugs with similar structures but different liver toxicity profiles. We also investigated integrating knowledge-based and structure-based representations, Q(K + S)ARs, for further enhanced prediction accuracy. Our findings demonstrate the potential of QKARs as a robust alternative to QSARs, offering additional opportunities in drug toxicity assessments by leveraging both domain-specific knowledge and structural data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Toxicological Sciences
Published
2025-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfaf135
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.50

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond QSARs: Quantitative Knowledge–Activity Relationships (QKARs) for enhanced drug toxicity prediction

Weida Tong, Alexander Chen, Shraddha Thakkar, Ting Li et al.
1 citations
Toxicological Sciences
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
1.50
article

Beyond QSARs: Quantitative Knowledge–Activity Relationships (QKARs) for enhanced drug toxicity prediction

Weida Tong, Alexander Chen, Shraddha Thakkar, Ting Li, Dongying Li, Yanyan Qu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Computational toxicology plays an important role in risk assessment and drug safety. The field has been traditionally dominated by Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (QSARs), which predict toxicological effects based solely on chemical structure. Although QSARs have achieved successes, their structure reliance limits drug toxicity predictions, where small structural modifications may cause major toxicity changes. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI), especially text embedding and generative AI, provide an opportunity to enhance toxicity predictions by leveraging broader chemical knowledge and its integration with structural data. In this study, we propose a novel framework, Quantitative Knowledge-Activity Relationships (QKARs), which predicts toxicity using domain-specific knowledge. We developed QKAR models for two drug toxicity endpoints, drug-induced liver injury (DILI) and drug-induced cardiotoxicity (DICT), using three different knowledge representations with varying levels of knowledge. The representations based on comprehensive knowledge of the drugs yielded better prediction than those with simpler knowledge. Five machine learning algorithms of distinct complexity were applied in QKAR models, and we observed little association between model complexity and performance. Further, we evaluated QKARs against QSARs on the same endpoints using identical datasets. We found that QKARs consistently outperformed QSARs for DILI and DICT. Notably, QKARs demonstrated better capability than QSARs in differentiating drugs with similar structures but different liver toxicity profiles. We also investigated integrating knowledge-based and structure-based representations, Q(K + S)ARs, for further enhanced prediction accuracy. Our findings demonstrate the potential of QKARs as a robust alternative to QSARs, offering additional opportunities in drug toxicity assessments by leveraging both domain-specific knowledge and structural data.

Toxicological SciencesVol. 208(2)
University of Arkansas at Little Rock (US), National Center for Toxicological Research (US), United States Food and Drug Administration (US), Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (US), University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (US)
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
1.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.