EXPLAINABLE MACHINE LEARNING FOR EVALUATING DIABETES PREDICTION MODELS

The present study has investigated the use of Explainable AI (XAI) machine learning models for diabetes prediction, with a particular focus on SHAP (Shapley Additive Explanations) values and XGBoost importances (gain). Using the publicly available Pima Indians Diabetes dataset there were various classification models: Logistic Regression, Random Forest, and XGBoost trained and evaluated based on the parameters: Accuracy, and AUC. Global and local explainability was further assessed through SHAP bar plots and XGboost gain importances plots were used for analyzing structural feature importances. Results gathered suggested that stabilized glucose level and age were the most influential predictors of diabetes across models even though differences emerged in the ranking of the feature HDL (High-Density Lipoprotein) cholesterol. Overall, while SHAP provided a hybrid understanding of local and global patient-specific explanations, XGboost gain importances gave structural importance. The discussion section also includes how the combination of these two tools provided a hybrid, comprehensive and nuanced understanding about how these models bridge the “black-box” gap in clinical decision-making, ensuring trust, clarity and transparency in the prediction of AI models for sensitive domains like healthcare applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53555/azgy5g23
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EXPLAINABLE MACHINE LEARNING FOR EVALUATING DIABETES PREDICTION MODELS

Saumyaa Dhakan
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
article

EXPLAINABLE MACHINE LEARNING FOR EVALUATING DIABETES PREDICTION MODELS

Saumyaa Dhakan
article en

Abstract

The present study has investigated the use of Explainable AI (XAI) machine learning models for diabetes prediction, with a particular focus on SHAP (Shapley Additive Explanations) values and XGBoost importances (gain). Using the publicly available Pima Indians Diabetes dataset there were various classification models: Logistic Regression, Random Forest, and XGBoost trained and evaluated based on the parameters: Accuracy, and AUC. Global and local explainability was further assessed through SHAP bar plots and XGboost gain importances plots were used for analyzing structural feature importances. Results gathered suggested that stabilized glucose level and age were the most influential predictors of diabetes across models even though differences emerged in the ranking of the feature HDL (High-Density Lipoprotein) cholesterol. Overall, while SHAP provided a hybrid understanding of local and global patient-specific explanations, XGboost gain importances gave structural importance. The discussion section also includes how the combination of these two tools provided a hybrid, comprehensive and nuanced understanding about how these models bridge the “black-box” gap in clinical decision-making, ensuring trust, clarity and transparency in the prediction of AI models for sensitive domains like healthcare applications.

Fountain University (NG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.