Взаємодія генотип-середовище при екологічному випробуванні сортів гороху у системі AMMI та GGE biplot аналізів

Results of AMMI and GGE biplot analysis summarizing data of environmental trials of pea cultivars are presented. The results of these methods were not identical and indicate the importance of each of these algorithms. Thus, the distribution of pea accessions by ranks (ASV) in the AMMI model placed cv. ‘Haiduk’ in the first position, but according to the results of the GGE biplot analysis, cv. ‘Oplot’ was the best ("ideal") genotype. Graphical visualization of results marking megaenvironments and cultivars that are the best in these environments is additional information to adjust breeding programs and to create adaptable pea cultivars for different growing zones. A separate advantage of GGE biplot is that it is able to assess the informativeness of test environments. In our study, not only the trial locations (Odesa State Experimental Station [Odeska Oblast], Ustymivka Experimental Station [Poltavska Oblast] and Yuriev Plant Production Institute [Kharkivska Oblast]) but also each year of trials at each location differed. Thus, AMMI and GGE biplot analysis, which process data of environmental trials of pea, do not exclude each other, but on the contrary, provide more detailed and complete information.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plant Breeding and Seed Production
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30835/2413-7510.2025.333727
Primary Topic
Genetics and Plant Breeding
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Взаємодія генотип-середовище при екологічному випробуванні сортів гороху у системі AMMI та GGE biplot аналізів

В. І. Січкар, A. О. Vasylenko, V.V. Serdyuk, Nadiia Vus et al.
Plant Breeding and Seed Production
Genetics and Plant Breeding
article

Взаємодія генотип-середовище при екологічному випробуванні сортів гороху у системі AMMI та GGE biplot аналізів

В. І. Січкар, A. О. Vasylenko, V.V. Serdyuk, Nadiia Vus, С. І. Силенко, P. М. Solonechnyi, Ruslan Solomonov, A. V. Glyantsev, Л. М. Шевченко
article en

Abstract

Results of AMMI and GGE biplot analysis summarizing data of environmental trials of pea cultivars are presented. The results of these methods were not identical and indicate the importance of each of these algorithms. Thus, the distribution of pea accessions by ranks (ASV) in the AMMI model placed cv. ‘Haiduk’ in the first position, but according to the results of the GGE biplot analysis, cv. ‘Oplot’ was the best ("ideal") genotype. Graphical visualization of results marking megaenvironments and cultivars that are the best in these environments is additional information to adjust breeding programs and to create adaptable pea cultivars for different growing zones. A separate advantage of GGE biplot is that it is able to assess the informativeness of test environments. In our study, not only the trial locations (Odesa State Experimental Station [Odeska Oblast], Ustymivka Experimental Station [Poltavska Oblast] and Yuriev Plant Production Institute [Kharkivska Oblast]) but also each year of trials at each location differed. Thus, AMMI and GGE biplot analysis, which process data of environmental trials of pea, do not exclude each other, but on the contrary, provide more detailed and complete information.

Plant Breeding and Seed Production(127)
Max Planck Society (DE), Weatherford College (US), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Genetics and Plant Breeding
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.