Clustering S&P 500 companies by machine learning for sustainable decision-making

This study examines the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance of S&P 500 companies using three clustering algorithms: K-Means, Gaussian Mixture Model, and Agglomerative Clustering. ESG scores from leading data providers are analysed to uncover sectoral patterns and performance trends. The findings indicate that technology and healthcare firms achieve the highest ESG scores, particularly in the governance and social dimensions, while the industrial and energy sectors face the greatest environmental challenges. Among the methods compared, K-Means demonstrates superior clustering performance by forming compact and well-separated ESG groups. These results offer a robust foundation for sector-specific ESG benchmarking, supporting investors and policymakers in identifying sustainability leaders, assessing risk, and targeting areas for improvement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economics and Business Review/˜The œPoznań University of Economics Review
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18559/ebr.2025.3.1895
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clustering S&P 500 companies by machine learning for sustainable decision-making

Cansu Ergenç, Rafet Aktaş
Economics and Business Review/˜The œPoznań University of Economics Review
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
article

Clustering S&P 500 companies by machine learning for sustainable decision-making

Cansu Ergenç, Rafet Aktaş
article en

Abstract

This study examines the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance of S&P 500 companies using three clustering algorithms: K-Means, Gaussian Mixture Model, and Agglomerative Clustering. ESG scores from leading data providers are analysed to uncover sectoral patterns and performance trends. The findings indicate that technology and healthcare firms achieve the highest ESG scores, particularly in the governance and social dimensions, while the industrial and energy sectors face the greatest environmental challenges. Among the methods compared, K-Means demonstrates superior clustering performance by forming compact and well-separated ESG groups. These results offer a robust foundation for sector-specific ESG benchmarking, supporting investors and policymakers in identifying sustainability leaders, assessing risk, and targeting areas for improvement.

Economics and Business Review/˜The œPoznań University of Economics ReviewVol. 11(3)
Ankara University (TR), Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Clustering S&P 500 companies by machine learning for sustainable decision-making — Cansu Ergenç, Rafet Aktaş · Economics and Business Review/˜The œPoznań University of Economics Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS