Rasch analysis of the mobile version of the eHealth literacy scale for cardiovascular disease patients

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading global health concern with rising morbidity and mortality. Despite medical advancements, effective self-management remains challenging due to patients' limited health literacy. While digital health interventions offer promising solutions, their efficacy depends on eHealth literacy. The mobile eHealth Literacy Scale (m-eHEALS) was developed to assess this construct, but its validity and applicability in CVD populations require further evaluation. This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the m-eHEALS in CVD patients using Rasch analysis. Patients from cardiology and neurology departments in two tertiary hospitals were consecutively enrolled (February 20-May 4, 2023). Demographic data and m-eHEALS scores were collected. Rasch analysis assessed unidimensionality, item fit, reliability, item difficulty, characteristic curves, and differential item functioning (DIF). A total of 302 patients' data were analyzed. The scale exhibited good psychometric properties, with a person separation index of 4.02 (person reliability = 0.94) and an item separation index of 8.96 (item reliability = 0.99). The unidimensionality analysis revealed a total explained variance of 70.5%; however, the first component residual eigenvalue was 3.1, suggesting potential multidimensionality. Item fit analysis identified five items (N4, N5, N6, N10, and N11) with misfit statistics outside the acceptable range (Infit MNSQ 0.49-1.55). ICC analysis confirmed good item discrimination for most items, though deviations were observed for N10 and N11. DIF analysis indicated gender-based differences for N12 (0.71 logits harder for females). The m-eHEALS demonstrated strong psychometric properties for assessing eHealth literacy in individuals with CVD, though some items exhibited poor fit with the data. Future research should explore subgroup characteristics to further enhance the scale's accuracy and broaden its applicability across different patient groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-14198-3
Primary Topic
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rasch analysis of the mobile version of the eHealth literacy scale for cardiovascular disease patients

Namuna Dallakoti, Yuhan Zhao, Yuan Luo, Yiqun Miao et al.
Scientific Reports
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
article

Rasch analysis of the mobile version of the eHealth literacy scale for cardiovascular disease patients

Namuna Dallakoti, Yuhan Zhao, Yuan Luo, Yiqun Miao, Qiaoling Hou, Jiawei Li, Ying Wu
article en

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading global health concern with rising morbidity and mortality. Despite medical advancements, effective self-management remains challenging due to patients' limited health literacy. While digital health interventions offer promising solutions, their efficacy depends on eHealth literacy. The mobile eHealth Literacy Scale (m-eHEALS) was developed to assess this construct, but its validity and applicability in CVD populations require further evaluation. This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the m-eHEALS in CVD patients using Rasch analysis. Patients from cardiology and neurology departments in two tertiary hospitals were consecutively enrolled (February 20-May 4, 2023). Demographic data and m-eHEALS scores were collected. Rasch analysis assessed unidimensionality, item fit, reliability, item difficulty, characteristic curves, and differential item functioning (DIF). A total of 302 patients' data were analyzed. The scale exhibited good psychometric properties, with a person separation index of 4.02 (person reliability = 0.94) and an item separation index of 8.96 (item reliability = 0.99). The unidimensionality analysis revealed a total explained variance of 70.5%; however, the first component residual eigenvalue was 3.1, suggesting potential multidimensionality. Item fit analysis identified five items (N4, N5, N6, N10, and N11) with misfit statistics outside the acceptable range (Infit MNSQ 0.49-1.55). ICC analysis confirmed good item discrimination for most items, though deviations were observed for N10 and N11. DIF analysis indicated gender-based differences for N12 (0.71 logits harder for females). The m-eHEALS demonstrated strong psychometric properties for assessing eHealth literacy in individuals with CVD, though some items exhibited poor fit with the data. Future research should explore subgroup characteristics to further enhance the scale's accuracy and broaden its applicability across different patient groups.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Capital Medical University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.