Development of a deep learning model for survival prediction in heart failure: competing risk and frailty model

This study presents a novel deep learning (DL) framework, the Deep Neural Frailty Competing Risks (DNFCR) model, which simultaneously integrates frailty and competing risks (CR) for mortality prediction in heart failure (HF). While existing models like Neural Frailty Models (NFM) address frailty and DeepHit handles CR, DNFCR is the first DL approach to combine both components, offering improved handling of censored data in healthcare applications. We evaluated DNFCR against established models (DeepSurv, CoxPH) using real-world HF data, assessing its ability to capture unobserved heterogeneity through proportional (DNFCR_PF) and non-proportional (DNFCR_NF) frailty structures. In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed 435 HF patients (enrolled March-September 2018; 5-year follow-up until July 2023) with 57 demographic/clinical features, categorized by cause-specific mortality. The models' performance was evaluated using the C-index, IBS, and INBLL. Our results in mortality from heart failure demonstrated marginal but consistent improvements in predictive accuracy when incorporating frailty (C-index: ~0.66). Differences in predicting other-cause mortality were minimal across the models. DNFCR-PF also performed better regarding the IBS (0.17 ± 0.01) and INBLL (0.02 ± 0.53). However, the clinical relevance of the cause-specific mortality requires further validation in both outcome categories. Comparative analysis revealed that DNFCR and traditional models achieved comparable accuracy in survival prediction, highlighting that DL's superiority is context-dependent and influenced by data and unmeasured confounders. Strengths include DNFCR's potential for personalized risk stratification and adaptability to other diseases with CR. The DNFCR model showed DL potential in HF survival prediction but requires clinical validation compared to traditional approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-14715-4
Primary Topic
Frailty in Older Adults
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of a deep learning model for survival prediction in heart failure: competing risk and frailty model

Nasim Naderi, Solmaz Norouzi, Mohammad Asghari Jafarabadi, Ebrahim Hajizadeh et al.
Scientific Reports
Frailty in Older Adults
article

Development of a deep learning model for survival prediction in heart failure: competing risk and frailty model

Nasim Naderi, Solmaz Norouzi, Mohammad Asghari Jafarabadi, Ebrahim Hajizadeh, Hossein Khormaei
article en

Abstract

This study presents a novel deep learning (DL) framework, the Deep Neural Frailty Competing Risks (DNFCR) model, which simultaneously integrates frailty and competing risks (CR) for mortality prediction in heart failure (HF). While existing models like Neural Frailty Models (NFM) address frailty and DeepHit handles CR, DNFCR is the first DL approach to combine both components, offering improved handling of censored data in healthcare applications. We evaluated DNFCR against established models (DeepSurv, CoxPH) using real-world HF data, assessing its ability to capture unobserved heterogeneity through proportional (DNFCR_PF) and non-proportional (DNFCR_NF) frailty structures. In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed 435 HF patients (enrolled March-September 2018; 5-year follow-up until July 2023) with 57 demographic/clinical features, categorized by cause-specific mortality. The models' performance was evaluated using the C-index, IBS, and INBLL. Our results in mortality from heart failure demonstrated marginal but consistent improvements in predictive accuracy when incorporating frailty (C-index: ~0.66). Differences in predicting other-cause mortality were minimal across the models. DNFCR-PF also performed better regarding the IBS (0.17 ± 0.01) and INBLL (0.02 ± 0.53). However, the clinical relevance of the cause-specific mortality requires further validation in both outcome categories. Comparative analysis revealed that DNFCR and traditional models achieved comparable accuracy in survival prediction, highlighting that DL's superiority is context-dependent and influenced by data and unmeasured confounders. Strengths include DNFCR's potential for personalized risk stratification and adaptability to other diseases with CR. The DNFCR model showed DL potential in HF survival prediction but requires clinical validation compared to traditional approaches.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Zanjan University of Medical Sciences (IR), Tarbiat Modares University (IR), Iran University of Medical Sciences (IR), Monash Health (AU), Shaheed Rajaei Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center (IR), Monash University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Frailty in Older Adults
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.