Comparison of control systems for multirotor UAV [in Ukrainian]

This paper investigates the problem of quadcopter altitude stabilization under external disturbances, particularly wind gusts. For the analysis, a mathematical model of a multirotor UAV based on the Newton–Euler equations for a rigid body with six degrees of freedom (6-DOF) was used. The study was carried out in the MATLAB/Simulink environment, which made it possible to simulate the operation of a closed-loop control system under realistic environmental influences. The aim of the work is to compare three approaches to altitude control: the classical PID controller, the fuzzy PD controller (fuzzy-PD), and the optimal Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR). For each strategy, tuning, simulation, and analysis of transient responses were performed. The effectiveness was evaluated using key indicators: settling time, overshoot, and root mean square error (RMSE) under wind disturbances. The obtained results showed that the fuzzy-PD controller provides the best overall control quality: the fastest transient response, minimal overshoot, and the lowest error under disturbances. The LQR regulator demonstrated high robustness and a balance between speed and accuracy, significantly outperforming the classical PID in all criteria. The PID controller served as a basic benchmark but exhibited the highest sensitivity to wind effects. Thus, the study confirms the feasibility of using adaptive and optimal approaches (fuzzy-PD and LQR) to ensure reliable quadcopter altitude stabilization in a changing environment, which is practically important for aerial photography, monitoring, inspection, and search-and-rescue missions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the NTUU “Igor Sikorsky KPI” Series Chemical engineering ecology and resource saving
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20535/2617-9741.3.2025.340377
Primary Topic
Advanced Control and Stabilization in Aerospace Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of control systems for multirotor UAV [in Ukrainian]

Bohdan Bihanskyi, Dmytro Kovaliuk
Proceedings of the NTUU “Igor Sikorsky KPI” Series Chemical engineering ecology and resource saving
Advanced Control and Stabilization in Aerospace Systems
article

Comparison of control systems for multirotor UAV [in Ukrainian]

Bohdan Bihanskyi, Dmytro Kovaliuk
article en

Abstract

This paper investigates the problem of quadcopter altitude stabilization under external disturbances, particularly wind gusts. For the analysis, a mathematical model of a multirotor UAV based on the Newton–Euler equations for a rigid body with six degrees of freedom (6-DOF) was used. The study was carried out in the MATLAB/Simulink environment, which made it possible to simulate the operation of a closed-loop control system under realistic environmental influences. The aim of the work is to compare three approaches to altitude control: the classical PID controller, the fuzzy PD controller (fuzzy-PD), and the optimal Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR). For each strategy, tuning, simulation, and analysis of transient responses were performed. The effectiveness was evaluated using key indicators: settling time, overshoot, and root mean square error (RMSE) under wind disturbances. The obtained results showed that the fuzzy-PD controller provides the best overall control quality: the fastest transient response, minimal overshoot, and the lowest error under disturbances. The LQR regulator demonstrated high robustness and a balance between speed and accuracy, significantly outperforming the classical PID in all criteria. The PID controller served as a basic benchmark but exhibited the highest sensitivity to wind effects. Thus, the study confirms the feasibility of using adaptive and optimal approaches (fuzzy-PD and LQR) to ensure reliable quadcopter altitude stabilization in a changing environment, which is practically important for aerial photography, monitoring, inspection, and search-and-rescue missions.

Proceedings of the NTUU “Igor Sikorsky KPI” Series Chemical engineering ecology and resource saving(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Advanced Control and Stabilization in Aerospace Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.