Are Deposit–Return Schemes an Optimal Solution for Beverage Container Collection in the European Union? An Evidence Review

The insufficient effectiveness of the European packaging waste policy has prompted the European Union to adopt more decisive measures in 2025. The Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation of 2024 obliges Member States to use deposit–return systems to achieve high collection rates for beverage packaging and, as a result, to enhance packaging circularity. As evidence supporting this approach, i.e., that deposit systems indeed are an efficient solution for packaging waste collection, is still scattered, this article provides a systematic review of the evidence on various aspects of the use of deposit systems. A key finding of our review is that both scientific and empirical evidence support the European Union’s decision to make deposit–return systems mandatory: in European countries that have fully operational systems, the collection rates of packaging covered by these systems exceeded 85%. In addition to this positive contribution to packaging circularity, a significant (40–60%) reduction in littering is reported after implementation of the deposit systems. A significant novelty of this review is the presentation of the latest empirical data suggesting that deposit systems may be comparable to alternative collection methods in terms of costs to producers. Comprehensive assessments conducted using the cost–benefit analysis methods confirm that deposit systems generate net social benefits. It is suggested that innovations in logistics contribute to reduced environmental impacts of transport and transport-related costs. For this reason, updated life cycle assessments and cost–benefit analyses of deposit systems are needed to assess the role of deposit systems within the European circular economy framework.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su17198791
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Economic Theory and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
21.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are Deposit–Return Schemes an Optimal Solution for Beverage Container Collection in the European Union? An Evidence Review

Edyta Sidorczuk-Pietraszko, Wojciech Piontek, Anna Larsson
7 citations
Sustainability
Economic Theory and Policy
21.60
article

Are Deposit–Return Schemes an Optimal Solution for Beverage Container Collection in the European Union? An Evidence Review

Edyta Sidorczuk-Pietraszko, Wojciech Piontek, Anna Larsson
article en
7 citations

Abstract

The insufficient effectiveness of the European packaging waste policy has prompted the European Union to adopt more decisive measures in 2025. The Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation of 2024 obliges Member States to use deposit–return systems to achieve high collection rates for beverage packaging and, as a result, to enhance packaging circularity. As evidence supporting this approach, i.e., that deposit systems indeed are an efficient solution for packaging waste collection, is still scattered, this article provides a systematic review of the evidence on various aspects of the use of deposit systems. A key finding of our review is that both scientific and empirical evidence support the European Union’s decision to make deposit–return systems mandatory: in European countries that have fully operational systems, the collection rates of packaging covered by these systems exceeded 85%. In addition to this positive contribution to packaging circularity, a significant (40–60%) reduction in littering is reported after implementation of the deposit systems. A significant novelty of this review is the presentation of the latest empirical data suggesting that deposit systems may be comparable to alternative collection methods in terms of costs to producers. Comprehensive assessments conducted using the cost–benefit analysis methods confirm that deposit systems generate net social benefits. It is suggested that innovations in logistics contribute to reduced environmental impacts of transport and transport-related costs. For this reason, updated life cycle assessments and cost–benefit analyses of deposit systems are needed to assess the role of deposit systems within the European circular economy framework.

SustainabilityVol. 17(19)
Jagiellonian University (PL), Bialystok University of Technology (PL), University of Białystok (PL), Bialystok School of Economics (PL), AGH University of Krakow (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Economic Theory and Policy
21.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.