Phenomenological study on decision fatigue among surrogate decision-makers for ICU patients

Surrogate decision-makers often face multiple medical decisions under psychological and time pressures, leading to decision fatigue. Current research on decision fatigue in intensive care unit (ICU) surrogates focuses primarily on quantitative aspects, lacking an in-depth exploration of their experiences. This study aims to explore the experience of decision fatigue among surrogate decision-makers for ICU patients within the first 48 hours of ICU admission and to provide insights for clinical medical staff to implement decision support strategies and improve decision quality. This study employed purposive sampling, with sufficient samples being reached when no new themes emerged from the interviews, to select surrogate decision-makers of patients admitted to the ICU within 48 hours. Then, qualitative phenomenological research methods were employed for semi-structured interviews. Colaizzi method was used to analyze and refine the interview data. Ten surrogate decision-makers were included in this study. Surrogate decision-makers experienced decision fatigue during the early stages of ICU admission, characterized by 5 primary themes: emotional exhaustion, increased cognitive load, hesitation in decision-making, conflicting decisions, and inadequate support systems. Within the initial 48 hours in the ICU, surrogate decision-makers of patients may experience decision fatigue during the decision-making process. Medical staff should be aware of this phenomenon, take appropriate intervention measures, and provide decision-making support to enhance the quality of decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000044669
Primary Topic
Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Phenomenological study on decision fatigue among surrogate decision-makers for ICU patients

Yaoning Zhuang, Ying Xu, Lisang Fu, Peipei Li
Medicine
Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
article

Phenomenological study on decision fatigue among surrogate decision-makers for ICU patients

Yaoning Zhuang, Ying Xu, Lisang Fu, Peipei Li
article en

Abstract

Surrogate decision-makers often face multiple medical decisions under psychological and time pressures, leading to decision fatigue. Current research on decision fatigue in intensive care unit (ICU) surrogates focuses primarily on quantitative aspects, lacking an in-depth exploration of their experiences. This study aims to explore the experience of decision fatigue among surrogate decision-makers for ICU patients within the first 48 hours of ICU admission and to provide insights for clinical medical staff to implement decision support strategies and improve decision quality. This study employed purposive sampling, with sufficient samples being reached when no new themes emerged from the interviews, to select surrogate decision-makers of patients admitted to the ICU within 48 hours. Then, qualitative phenomenological research methods were employed for semi-structured interviews. Colaizzi method was used to analyze and refine the interview data. Ten surrogate decision-makers were included in this study. Surrogate decision-makers experienced decision fatigue during the early stages of ICU admission, characterized by 5 primary themes: emotional exhaustion, increased cognitive load, hesitation in decision-making, conflicting decisions, and inadequate support systems. Within the initial 48 hours in the ICU, surrogate decision-makers of patients may experience decision fatigue during the decision-making process. Medical staff should be aware of this phenomenon, take appropriate intervention measures, and provide decision-making support to enhance the quality of decisions.

MedicineVol. 104(39)
Putian University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.