CERTAIN ISSUES OF ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSIBILITY FOR MILITARY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFENSES

The article examines the issues of legal regulation of administrative responsibility for military personnel in Ukraine, particularly the innovations introduced in Chapter 13-B of the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses (CUAO). The relevance of the topic is determined by legislative changes in response to contemporary challenges, especially during russia’s armed aggression against Ukraine. The authors analyze the problems arising in the process of holding military personnel administratively liable, including the uncertainty of the subject in relation to the offenses, difficulties in qualifying actions, and the insufficient clarity of legislative norms. The article identifies three groups of norms that regulate the administrative responsibility of military personnel, namely general principles, types of administrative offenses, and special provisions. The authors highlight issues related to the application of the law. Specifically, descriptions of military offenses are found not only in Chapter 13-B of the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses (CUAO), but also in other chapters of the Code. The issue of the subject composition of many offenses remains unresolved, as the status of reservists, individuals undergoing alternative service, and those serving in territorial defense units is undefined. There are also difficulties in qualifying the relevant offenses, given the inconsistency of the terms “special period” and “martial law.” Furthermore, the majority of the types of administrative offenses specified in Chapter 13-B of the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses (CUAO) can only be identified by leaders (commanders) of military units. This means that many of these offenses remain latent and do not lead to the imposition of any sanctions. The authors conclude that the regulation of administrative responsibility for military offenses is improper, requiring urgent resolution to enhance discipline and the rule of law in the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Key words: administrative responsibility, military personnel, reservist, liable for military service, sanctions, punishment, violation of rules.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Krimìnalʹno-vikonavča sistema: včora, sʹogodnì, zavtra
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32755/sjcriminal.2025.02.101
Primary Topic
International Law and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CERTAIN ISSUES OF ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSIBILITY FOR MILITARY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFENSES

L. Shestak, N. Rybalka
Krimìnalʹno-vikonavča sistema: včora, sʹogodnì, zavtra
International Law and Human Rights
article

CERTAIN ISSUES OF ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSIBILITY FOR MILITARY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFENSES

L. Shestak, N. Rybalka
article en

Abstract

The article examines the issues of legal regulation of administrative responsibility for military personnel in Ukraine, particularly the innovations introduced in Chapter 13-B of the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses (CUAO). The relevance of the topic is determined by legislative changes in response to contemporary challenges, especially during russia’s armed aggression against Ukraine. The authors analyze the problems arising in the process of holding military personnel administratively liable, including the uncertainty of the subject in relation to the offenses, difficulties in qualifying actions, and the insufficient clarity of legislative norms. The article identifies three groups of norms that regulate the administrative responsibility of military personnel, namely general principles, types of administrative offenses, and special provisions. The authors highlight issues related to the application of the law. Specifically, descriptions of military offenses are found not only in Chapter 13-B of the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses (CUAO), but also in other chapters of the Code. The issue of the subject composition of many offenses remains unresolved, as the status of reservists, individuals undergoing alternative service, and those serving in territorial defense units is undefined. There are also difficulties in qualifying the relevant offenses, given the inconsistency of the terms “special period” and “martial law.” Furthermore, the majority of the types of administrative offenses specified in Chapter 13-B of the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses (CUAO) can only be identified by leaders (commanders) of military units. This means that many of these offenses remain latent and do not lead to the imposition of any sanctions. The authors conclude that the regulation of administrative responsibility for military offenses is improper, requiring urgent resolution to enhance discipline and the rule of law in the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Key words: administrative responsibility, military personnel, reservist, liable for military service, sanctions, punishment, violation of rules.

Krimìnalʹno-vikonavča sistema: včora, sʹogodnì, zavtraVol. 2025(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
International Law and Human Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

CERTAIN ISSUES OF ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSIBILITY FOR MILITARY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFENSES — L. Shestak, N. Rybalka · Krimìnalʹno-vikonavča sistema: včora, sʹogodnì, zavtra (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS