Drinking water resources suitability assessment in Brahmani river Odisha based on pollution index of surface water utilizing advanced water quality methods

The prediction and management of water quality are critical to ensure Sustainable water resources, particularly in regions like Odisha, where rivers face increasing pollution from industrialization, agriculture, and urban expansion. The Brahmani River, located in the Odisha State, is the 2nd largest watershed in the province, by which its water quality is affected by natural and anthropogenic changes. In this research, water samples were gathered throughout the monsoon season for four years (2020-2024) from previously selected 7 sampling stations. Geographical Information System (GIS) techniques were used to find out the distribution of surface water quality on land use pattern. A particular focus is given to hybrid models that integrate multiple approaches to improve predictive accuracy and robustness. Therefore, the study was undertaken by incorporating Weighted Arithmetic (WA) Water Quality Index (WQI), Synthetic Pollution Index (SPI), Nemerow Pollution Index (NPI), Overall Index of Pollution (OIP), multivariate statistical method, namely Factor Analysis (FA) or Principal Component Analysis (PCA), and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) approaches like Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS). The goal of this investigation is to evaluate the water's purity and whether it is Suitable for consumption. Fifteen physicochemical parameters were tested from 7 observation stations. Referring to the present research, the obtained order of anionic abundance was SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2-</sup> > Cl<sup>-</sup> > NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> >F<sup>-</sup> > PO<sub>4</sub><sup>3</sup><sup>-</sup>. However, the order of cationic abundance was Ca<sup>2+</sup> > Mg<sup>2</sup><sup>+</sup> > Na<sup>+</sup> > K<sup>+</sup>. The calculated WA-WQI values ranged between 49 and 72. Toxic heavy metals, nutrients, and microorganisms were the major pollutants influencing water quality, as stated by WA-WQI. In addition, the data was interpreted using pollution indices such as SPI (0.31-0.68), NPI (6-29.91), and OIP (0.45-4.40). By results, it is concluded that mainly 4 sites are unsuitable for drinking and irrigation purposes, due to long-term use of waste water, anthropogenic activities, over-extraction of Surface water and changes in land use pattern. Using the multivariate technique, the PCA method was useful to identify two latent pollution sources, that correctly assign 89% of the total variance in the dataset. During the first component, the major loadings on parameters: TDS, EC, alkalinity, Na<sup>+</sup>, Ca<sup>2+</sup>, Mg<sup>2+</sup>, K<sup>+</sup>, F<sup>-</sup>, Cl<sup>-</sup>, NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup>, and SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2</sup><sup>-</sup>. It indicates that locations were primarily Harmed by oxygen-consuming organic and Hazardous contamination. Furthermore, the EDAS score fluctuated between 0.01 and 0.97. The results revealed that Y-(1) mentioned high polluted water, followed by Y-(2) and Y-(7). This signifies the existence of dissolving biological material; nitrogen was the major pollutant, originating primarily from anthropogenic local contamination. Later on, the outcomes of water quality parameters on the different indexing methods were evaluated, and the obtained outcomes indicate that the highest mean effective weight value belongs to the TDS, EC, Cl<sup>-</sup>, SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2-</sup> and PO<sub>4</sub><sup>3</sup><sup>-</sup>, respectively. Notably, effective control of point source pollution and upper river ecological restoration should be done to improve the water quality and protect the reservoir. This research identifies key research gaps and proposes future directions for developing transparent, adaptive, and accurate models. The findings can also guide researchers and policymakers towards the development of smart water quality management systems that enhance decision-making and ecological sustainability.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-19539-w
Citations
14
Primary Topic
Water Quality and Pollution Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Drinking water resources suitability assessment in Brahmani river Odisha based on pollution index of surface water utilizing advanced water quality methods

14 citations
Scientific Reports
Water Quality and Pollution Assessment
11.44
article

Drinking water resources suitability assessment in Brahmani river Odisha based on pollution index of surface water utilizing advanced water quality methods

article en
14 citations

Abstract

The prediction and management of water quality are critical to ensure Sustainable water resources, particularly in regions like Odisha, where rivers face increasing pollution from industrialization, agriculture, and urban expansion. The Brahmani River, located in the Odisha State, is the 2nd largest watershed in the province, by which its water quality is affected by natural and anthropogenic changes. In this research, water samples were gathered throughout the monsoon season for four years (2020-2024) from previously selected 7 sampling stations. Geographical Information System (GIS) techniques were used to find out the distribution of surface water quality on land use pattern. A particular focus is given to hybrid models that integrate multiple approaches to improve predictive accuracy and robustness. Therefore, the study was undertaken by incorporating Weighted Arithmetic (WA) Water Quality Index (WQI), Synthetic Pollution Index (SPI), Nemerow Pollution Index (NPI), Overall Index of Pollution (OIP), multivariate statistical method, namely Factor Analysis (FA) or Principal Component Analysis (PCA), and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) approaches like Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS). The goal of this investigation is to evaluate the water's purity and whether it is Suitable for consumption. Fifteen physicochemical parameters were tested from 7 observation stations. Referring to the present research, the obtained order of anionic abundance was SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2-</sup> > Cl<sup>-</sup> > NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> >F<sup>-</sup> > PO<sub>4</sub><sup>3</sup><sup>-</sup>. However, the order of cationic abundance was Ca<sup>2+</sup> > Mg<sup>2</sup><sup>+</sup> > Na<sup>+</sup> > K<sup>+</sup>. The calculated WA-WQI values ranged between 49 and 72. Toxic heavy metals, nutrients, and microorganisms were the major pollutants influencing water quality, as stated by WA-WQI. In addition, the data was interpreted using pollution indices such as SPI (0.31-0.68), NPI (6-29.91), and OIP (0.45-4.40). By results, it is concluded that mainly 4 sites are unsuitable for drinking and irrigation purposes, due to long-term use of waste water, anthropogenic activities, over-extraction of Surface water and changes in land use pattern. Using the multivariate technique, the PCA method was useful to identify two latent pollution sources, that correctly assign 89% of the total variance in the dataset. During the first component, the major loadings on parameters: TDS, EC, alkalinity, Na<sup>+</sup>, Ca<sup>2+</sup>, Mg<sup>2+</sup>, K<sup>+</sup>, F<sup>-</sup>, Cl<sup>-</sup>, NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup>, and SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2</sup><sup>-</sup>. It indicates that locations were primarily Harmed by oxygen-consuming organic and Hazardous contamination. Furthermore, the EDAS score fluctuated between 0.01 and 0.97. The results revealed that Y-(1) mentioned high polluted water, followed by Y-(2) and Y-(7). This signifies the existence of dissolving biological material; nitrogen was the major pollutant, originating primarily from anthropogenic local contamination. Later on, the outcomes of water quality parameters on the different indexing methods were evaluated, and the obtained outcomes indicate that the highest mean effective weight value belongs to the TDS, EC, Cl<sup>-</sup>, SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2-</sup> and PO<sub>4</sub><sup>3</sup><sup>-</sup>, respectively. Notably, effective control of point source pollution and upper river ecological restoration should be done to improve the water quality and protect the reservoir. This research identifies key research gaps and proposes future directions for developing transparent, adaptive, and accurate models. The findings can also guide researchers and policymakers towards the development of smart water quality management systems that enhance decision-making and ecological sustainability.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Vivekananda Global University (IN), C.V. Raman Global University, Global University (LB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Water Quality and Pollution Assessment
11.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.