A Comparative Analysis of Arm Regeneration in Astropecten indicus and Ophiocnemis marmorata

Echinoderms are renowned for their exceptional regenerative abilities, but interspecies comparisons have lacked rigorous quantitative analysis. This study compares arm regeneration in Astropecten indicus and Ophiocnemis marmorata under controlled conditions (37±0.7 ppt salinity, 17±0.3°C). Following 1 cm arm amputations (n=10/species), O. marmorata formed blastemas in 48–72 h, significantly faster than A. indicus (72–120 h, P<0.01). By week 5, 90% of O. marmorata had regrown arms to 2.0±0.2 cm, while only 55% of A. indicus achieved 1.8–2.0±0.3 cm by week 6. O. marmorata developed tube feet by week 2, compared to week 3 in A. indicus, and regained full mobility by week 4, while A. indicus required 5–6 weeks. Scarring was minimal in O. marmorata (<5%), compared to 15% in A. indicus. The survival rate of O. marmorata was higher (80%) compared to A. indicus (60%). These findings reveal distinct regenerative strategies: O. marmorata regenerates rapidly and without scarring, while A. indicus shows slower, fibrotic healing. The superior performance of O. marmorata, including faster blastema formation and complete anatomical restoration, makes it an ideal model for anti-fibrotic research, stem cell studies, and scaffold-free tissue engineering. This study provides the first quantitative framework for comparing echinoderm regeneration, offering promising insights into potential applications for human regenerative medicine.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ILMU KELAUTAN Indonesian Journal of Marine Sciences
Published
2025-07-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14710/ik.ijms.30.3.465-474
Primary Topic
Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Analysis of Arm Regeneration in Astropecten indicus and Ophiocnemis marmorata

Kumar Rangarajalu, Mohan Sivanandham, Prithiviraj Nagarajan, Divya Sekar et al.
ILMU KELAUTAN Indonesian Journal of Marine Sciences
Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
article

A Comparative Analysis of Arm Regeneration in Astropecten indicus and Ophiocnemis marmorata

Kumar Rangarajalu, Mohan Sivanandham, Prithiviraj Nagarajan, Divya Sekar, Asbar Banu Bazeer
article en

Abstract

Echinoderms are renowned for their exceptional regenerative abilities, but interspecies comparisons have lacked rigorous quantitative analysis. This study compares arm regeneration in Astropecten indicus and Ophiocnemis marmorata under controlled conditions (37±0.7 ppt salinity, 17±0.3°C). Following 1 cm arm amputations (n=10/species), O. marmorata formed blastemas in 48–72 h, significantly faster than A. indicus (72–120 h, P<0.01). By week 5, 90% of O. marmorata had regrown arms to 2.0±0.2 cm, while only 55% of A. indicus achieved 1.8–2.0±0.3 cm by week 6. O. marmorata developed tube feet by week 2, compared to week 3 in A. indicus, and regained full mobility by week 4, while A. indicus required 5–6 weeks. Scarring was minimal in O. marmorata (<5%), compared to 15% in A. indicus. The survival rate of O. marmorata was higher (80%) compared to A. indicus (60%). These findings reveal distinct regenerative strategies: O. marmorata regenerates rapidly and without scarring, while A. indicus shows slower, fibrotic healing. The superior performance of O. marmorata, including faster blastema formation and complete anatomical restoration, makes it an ideal model for anti-fibrotic research, stem cell studies, and scaffold-free tissue engineering. This study provides the first quantitative framework for comparing echinoderm regeneration, offering promising insights into potential applications for human regenerative medicine.

ILMU KELAUTAN Indonesian Journal of Marine SciencesVol. 30(3)
Vinayaka Missions University (IN)
Veterans Medical Research Foundation, U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command Aviation and Missile Center
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.