The relationships between Israeli pro- and anti-vaccination advocates during pre-COVID measles crisis: A case for dialogue

This article reports on a study that examined the relationships between Israeli pro- and anti-vaccination advocates during the 2018–2019 measles outbreak from a social marketing perspective. The analysis is based on interviews with leaders from both pro- and anti-vaccination groups, observation at an international conference, and a netnographic analysis of social media discourse. The findings indicate a lack of communication between social marketers who promote vaccination and anti-vaccination groups, with both sides largely avoiding engagement or listening to each other’s perspectives, whether online or offline. This absence of interaction contributed to polarization and misunderstanding, highlighting the challenges for social marketing when involved parties strategically choose not to listen or communicate in highly polarized contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Relations Inquiry
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/2046147x251383113
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The relationships between Israeli pro- and anti-vaccination advocates during pre-COVID measles crisis: A case for dialogue

Margalit Toledano, Ruth Avidar
Public Relations Inquiry
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
article

The relationships between Israeli pro- and anti-vaccination advocates during pre-COVID measles crisis: A case for dialogue

Margalit Toledano, Ruth Avidar
article en

Abstract

This article reports on a study that examined the relationships between Israeli pro- and anti-vaccination advocates during the 2018–2019 measles outbreak from a social marketing perspective. The analysis is based on interviews with leaders from both pro- and anti-vaccination groups, observation at an international conference, and a netnographic analysis of social media discourse. The findings indicate a lack of communication between social marketers who promote vaccination and anti-vaccination groups, with both sides largely avoiding engagement or listening to each other’s perspectives, whether online or offline. This absence of interaction contributed to polarization and misunderstanding, highlighting the challenges for social marketing when involved parties strategically choose not to listen or communicate in highly polarized contexts.

Public Relations Inquiry
The Max Stern Yezreel Valley College (IL), University of Waikato (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.