Predictive modeling of tax compliance risks: A comparative study of machine learning approaches

Modern enterprises grapple with complex financial data and multidimensional risk interdependencies in their operations. Machine learning offers transformative potential for tax risk assessment and smart auditing solutions. This research analyzes 3,232 tax records from regional manufacturing and service sectors (2021-2023) to evaluate three predictive models: SVM, XGBoost, and Random Forest. Results demonstrate Random Forest's superior performance, achieving 92.00% (manufacturing) and 93.39% (service) accuracy - substantially outperforming XGBoost and SVM (85-90%). Key manufacturing risk indicators follow a "high tax-high volatility-high scrutiny" pattern, with tax burden rate (0.129 weight), profit fluctuation (0.100), and audit frequency (0.091) being most predictive. Service sector risks manifest as "volatility-declaration-tax burden" dynamics, where profit volatility (0.142) emerges as the strongest predictor. These findings both validate machine learning's efficacy in tax analysis and equip regulators with intelligent risk management tools.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0331715
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Taxation and Compliance Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predictive modeling of tax compliance risks: A comparative study of machine learning approaches

Lan Yang
1 citations
PLoS ONE
Taxation and Compliance Studies
3.13
article

Predictive modeling of tax compliance risks: A comparative study of machine learning approaches

Lan Yang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Modern enterprises grapple with complex financial data and multidimensional risk interdependencies in their operations. Machine learning offers transformative potential for tax risk assessment and smart auditing solutions. This research analyzes 3,232 tax records from regional manufacturing and service sectors (2021-2023) to evaluate three predictive models: SVM, XGBoost, and Random Forest. Results demonstrate Random Forest's superior performance, achieving 92.00% (manufacturing) and 93.39% (service) accuracy - substantially outperforming XGBoost and SVM (85-90%). Key manufacturing risk indicators follow a "high tax-high volatility-high scrutiny" pattern, with tax burden rate (0.129 weight), profit fluctuation (0.100), and audit frequency (0.091) being most predictive. Service sector risks manifest as "volatility-declaration-tax burden" dynamics, where profit volatility (0.142) emerges as the strongest predictor. These findings both validate machine learning's efficacy in tax analysis and equip regulators with intelligent risk management tools.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(9)
Southeast Bangkok College (TH), Bangkok University (TH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Taxation and Compliance Studies
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Predictive modeling of tax compliance risks: A comparative study of machine learning approaches — Lan Yang · PLoS ONE (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS