A Comparison of MCMC and AMP Symbol Detectors for Single-Carrier Underwater Acoustic Communications

Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) and approximate message passing (AMP), as two typical approximate Bayesian inference approaches, have been extensively investigated in symbol detection for underwater acoustic (UWA) communications. Both types of symbol detectors have shown advantages over classical linear minimum mean squared error (LMMSE) symbol detector. However, it is unclear which detector shall be preferred from a point view of practical use. Motivated by this fact, we make a comparison between MCMC and AMP symbol detectors in terms of performance and complexity. Without loss of generality, a single-carrier UWA communication system is considered. Analytical results show MCMC-type detectors have higher complexity than AMP-type detectors. As to performance, experimental results indicate a standard MCMC detector using Gibbs sampler is inferior to a vector AMP (VAMP) detector. However, in light of the matrix splitting technique in form of successive over-relaxation (SOR), an SOR-MCMC detector with proper relaxation parameter can be comparable to the VAMP detector.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/vtc2025-spring65109.2025.11174512
Primary Topic
Underwater Vehicles and Communication Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparison of MCMC and AMP Symbol Detectors for Single-Carrier Underwater Acoustic Communications

Zhiheng Zhang, Jun Tao
Underwater Vehicles and Communication Systems
article

A Comparison of MCMC and AMP Symbol Detectors for Single-Carrier Underwater Acoustic Communications

Zhiheng Zhang, Jun Tao
article en

Abstract

Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) and approximate message passing (AMP), as two typical approximate Bayesian inference approaches, have been extensively investigated in symbol detection for underwater acoustic (UWA) communications. Both types of symbol detectors have shown advantages over classical linear minimum mean squared error (LMMSE) symbol detector. However, it is unclear which detector shall be preferred from a point view of practical use. Motivated by this fact, we make a comparison between MCMC and AMP symbol detectors in terms of performance and complexity. Without loss of generality, a single-carrier UWA communication system is considered. Analytical results show MCMC-type detectors have higher complexity than AMP-type detectors. As to performance, experimental results indicate a standard MCMC detector using Gibbs sampler is inferior to a vector AMP (VAMP) detector. However, in light of the matrix splitting technique in form of successive over-relaxation (SOR), an SOR-MCMC detector with proper relaxation parameter can be comparable to the VAMP detector.

Southeast University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Underwater Vehicles and Communication Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.