Health-professional communication skills and competencies in Australia: An interprofessional content analysis

Purpose Effective communication is central to safe and effective interprofessional collaboration and person-centred care within healthcare systems. A significant proportion of patient complaints and adverse outcomes in Australia are related to communication issues. The aim of this study was to compare and contrast the descriptions of communication skills across nine health-professional competency standards using content analysis. Methodology Researchers from nine distinct health professions used an interprofessional methodology to extract and organise terms related to healthcare communication from professional competency standards documents. Findings Eight domains, with 31 subdomains, were identified and compared by health profession and by overall subdomain frequency. There was a lack of standardised structure for professional practice standards and frequent embedding of communication skills within other core competencies. Also common was imprecise language regarding healthcare communication requirements, and definitions of terms were often lacking. Practical implications Consistent representation of some domains and subdomains across health professions could be a precursor to the development of common communication competencies. These could serve as a benchmark for program accreditations, professional bodies, and interprofessional or healthcare communication education. Value This research adds value due to the interprofessional research method, which modelled interprofessional collaborative practice and allowed interpretation of professional competency standards through a multiprofessional lens. Limitations Nine professional competency standards were included, representing the nine professions of the researchers; therefore, some professional competency standards were not included in the analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Education in Practice Journal of Research for Professional Learning
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33966/hepj.8.1.20466
Primary Topic
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Health-professional communication skills and competencies in Australia: An interprofessional content analysis

Shannon Saad, Michèle Verdonck, Kerry Peek, Kelly Lambert et al.
Health Education in Practice Journal of Research for Professional Learning
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
article

Health-professional communication skills and competencies in Australia: An interprofessional content analysis

Shannon Saad, Michèle Verdonck, Kerry Peek, Kelly Lambert, Fiona Bogossian, Natalie Dodd, Stevie‐Jae Hepburn, Debra C. Kerr, Judy Mullan, Katie Healy
article en

Abstract

Purpose Effective communication is central to safe and effective interprofessional collaboration and person-centred care within healthcare systems. A significant proportion of patient complaints and adverse outcomes in Australia are related to communication issues. The aim of this study was to compare and contrast the descriptions of communication skills across nine health-professional competency standards using content analysis. Methodology Researchers from nine distinct health professions used an interprofessional methodology to extract and organise terms related to healthcare communication from professional competency standards documents. Findings Eight domains, with 31 subdomains, were identified and compared by health profession and by overall subdomain frequency. There was a lack of standardised structure for professional practice standards and frequent embedding of communication skills within other core competencies. Also common was imprecise language regarding healthcare communication requirements, and definitions of terms were often lacking. Practical implications Consistent representation of some domains and subdomains across health professions could be a precursor to the development of common communication competencies. These could serve as a benchmark for program accreditations, professional bodies, and interprofessional or healthcare communication education. Value This research adds value due to the interprofessional research method, which modelled interprofessional collaborative practice and allowed interpretation of professional competency standards through a multiprofessional lens. Limitations Nine professional competency standards were included, representing the nine professions of the researchers; therefore, some professional competency standards were not included in the analysis.

Health Education in Practice Journal of Research for Professional LearningVol. 8(1)
The University of Sydney (AU), Queensland Health (AU), Deakin University (AU), University of the Sunshine Coast (AU), University of Wah (PK), Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (BR), Virtual High School (US)
Griffith University
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.