Mechanisms of exercise limitation in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and obesity: a case of engine-chassis mismatch

Obesity is a major risk factor for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), but its impact on limitations in peak oxygen uptake (V̇o<sub>2peak</sub>) and its Fick determinants remains unclear. We assessed these factors in patients with obesity and patients without obesity with HFpEF, and non-HFpEF controls. Patients with HFpEF were subgrouped by body mass index [body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 or < 30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>] into HFpEF with (HFpEF<sub>Obese</sub>, <i>n</i> = 139) or without obesity (HFpEF<sub>Nonobese</sub>, <i>n</i> = 317), and non-HFpEF controls (CON, <i>n</i> = 270). Cardiopulmonary exercise testing with simultaneous echocardiography assessed V̇o<sub>2peak</sub>, cardiac output (CO), stroke volume (SV), heart rate (HR), mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) dynamics, and arterio-venous oxygen difference (a-vO<sub>2</sub>diff). HFpEF<sub>Obese</sub> tended to have higher absolute V̇o<sub>2peak</sub> (+7%, <i>P</i> = 0.069), and significantly higher peak exercise CO and SV, with no differences in HR or a-vO<sub>2</sub>diff. Resting and exercise mPAP and mPAP/CO slopes did not differ between HFpEF obesity phenotypes. In contrast, bodyweight-indexed V̇o<sub>2peak</sub> was markedly lower in HFpEF<sub>Obese</sub> (-23%) despite comparable indexed peak CO and SV. Regardless of HFpEF subgroup, V̇o<sub>2peak</sub>, central (CO, HR, mPAP) and peripheral factors (a-vO<sub>2</sub>diff) were markedly impaired in HFpEF versus CON (<i>P</i> < 0.05 for all). Therefore, although patients with HFpEF<sub>Obese</sub> have preserved absolute V̇o<sub>2peak</sub> and cardiac reserve, bodyweight-indexing reveals that these adaptations are insufficient for the heightened metabolic and functional demands induced by obesity. Alternatively, several physiological HFpEF features are not exacerbated by obesity. This highlights the importance of incorporating weight loss alongside multicomponent therapeutic strategies to address exercise intolerance in HFpEF.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Patients with obesity with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) have larger hearts and preserved cardiac reserve, but this was insufficient to maintain bodyweight-indexed V̇o<sub>2peak</sub> at comparable levels to patients without obesity. Obesity did not exacerbate other HFpEF impairments, such as decreased oxygen extraction or elevated pulmonary pressures. This suggests weight loss may help to improve exercise intolerance in obese patients with HFpEF, but should be combined with other treatments to target all of the features that contribute to exercise intolerance in HFpEF.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00587.2025
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mechanisms of exercise limitation in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and obesity: a case of engine-chassis mismatch

Sarah Stroobants, Stephen Foulkes, Simon Vanhentenrijk, Maarten Falter et al.
1 citations
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
1.39
article

Mechanisms of exercise limitation in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and obesity: a case of engine-chassis mismatch

Sarah Stroobants, Stephen Foulkes, Simon Vanhentenrijk, Maarten Falter, Maurício Milani, Youri Bekhuis, Jan Verwerft, Boris Delpire, Lieven Herbots, Sibel Altintas, Mark J. Haykowsky, Rūta Jasaitytė, Guido Claessen, Siddharth Jogani, Sara Ferreira, Rik Pauwels
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Obesity is a major risk factor for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), but its impact on limitations in peak oxygen uptake (V̇o<sub>2peak</sub>) and its Fick determinants remains unclear. We assessed these factors in patients with obesity and patients without obesity with HFpEF, and non-HFpEF controls. Patients with HFpEF were subgrouped by body mass index [body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 or < 30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>] into HFpEF with (HFpEF<sub>Obese</sub>, <i>n</i> = 139) or without obesity (HFpEF<sub>Nonobese</sub>, <i>n</i> = 317), and non-HFpEF controls (CON, <i>n</i> = 270). Cardiopulmonary exercise testing with simultaneous echocardiography assessed V̇o<sub>2peak</sub>, cardiac output (CO), stroke volume (SV), heart rate (HR), mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) dynamics, and arterio-venous oxygen difference (a-vO<sub>2</sub>diff). HFpEF<sub>Obese</sub> tended to have higher absolute V̇o<sub>2peak</sub> (+7%, <i>P</i> = 0.069), and significantly higher peak exercise CO and SV, with no differences in HR or a-vO<sub>2</sub>diff. Resting and exercise mPAP and mPAP/CO slopes did not differ between HFpEF obesity phenotypes. In contrast, bodyweight-indexed V̇o<sub>2peak</sub> was markedly lower in HFpEF<sub>Obese</sub> (-23%) despite comparable indexed peak CO and SV. Regardless of HFpEF subgroup, V̇o<sub>2peak</sub>, central (CO, HR, mPAP) and peripheral factors (a-vO<sub>2</sub>diff) were markedly impaired in HFpEF versus CON (<i>P</i> < 0.05 for all). Therefore, although patients with HFpEF<sub>Obese</sub> have preserved absolute V̇o<sub>2peak</sub> and cardiac reserve, bodyweight-indexing reveals that these adaptations are insufficient for the heightened metabolic and functional demands induced by obesity. Alternatively, several physiological HFpEF features are not exacerbated by obesity. This highlights the importance of incorporating weight loss alongside multicomponent therapeutic strategies to address exercise intolerance in HFpEF.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Patients with obesity with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) have larger hearts and preserved cardiac reserve, but this was insufficient to maintain bodyweight-indexed V̇o<sub>2peak</sub> at comparable levels to patients without obesity. Obesity did not exacerbate other HFpEF impairments, such as decreased oxygen extraction or elevated pulmonary pressures. This suggests weight loss may help to improve exercise intolerance in obese patients with HFpEF, but should be combined with other treatments to target all of the features that contribute to exercise intolerance in HFpEF.

American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory PhysiologyVol. 329(5)
Cleveland Clinic (US), University of Alberta (CA), Jessa Hospital (BE), Bon Secours Heart & Vascular Institute (US), Alaska Heart and Vascular Institute (US), St Vincents Institute of Medical Research (AU), Hasselt University (BE), KU Leuven (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.