Testing the effect of the progenitor metallicity on the <sup>56</sup> Ni mass and constraining the progenitor scenarios in Type Ia supernovae

The analytical model found that the intrinsic variation in the initial metallicity of the Type Ia supernova (SN Ia) progenitor stars ( Z progenitor ) translates into a 25% variation in the synthesized 56 Ni mass, and therefore, into a difference of ∼0.2 mag in the observed peak luminosity of SNe Ia. Previous observational studies used the currently observed global gas-phase metallicity of host galaxies, instead of Z progenitor that was used in the model, and the studies showed a higher scatter in the 56 Ni mass measurements than the model prediction. We used Z progenitor of 34 normal SNe Ia and employed recent SN Ia explosion models with various configurations to cover the observed 56 Ni mass range. Unlike previous studies, which only used samples in the sub-solar range, our sample covers the Z progenitor range (1/3 Z ⊙ &lt; Z progenitor &lt; 3 Z ⊙ ), where most of the Z progenitor effect occurs. Linear regression returns a slope of 0.02 ± 0.03, which trend is opposite to that of the analytical model, but at at low statistical significance level. A comparison of our sample with SN Ia explosion models on the Z progenitor – 56 Ni mass diagram allowed us to constrain the progenitor scenarios. We also explored other chemical composition indicators, such as (Fe/H) progenitor and ( α /Fe) progenitor . For (Fe/H) progenitor , our sample follows the trend predicted by the analytical models, but at a low significance level (0.4 σ ). Noticeably, ( α /Fe) progenitor shows the opposite trend and a clear gap. When we split the sample at ( α /Fe) progenitor = 0.35( α /Fe) ⊙ , we find a 3 σ difference in the weighted means of the 56 Ni mass. Lastly, the standardized luminosities of SNe Ia in different Z progenitor groups differed by 0.14 ± 0.09 (1.6 σ ) mag. We highlight a holistic approach (from the progenitor star to the explosion with SN Ia and host galaxy observational data) to understanding the underlying physics of SNe Ia for a more accurate and precise cosmology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202555000
Primary Topic
Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Testing the effect of the progenitor metallicity on the 56 Ni mass and constraining the progenitor scenarios in Type Ia supernovae

Young-Lo Kim, Yong -Cheol Kim, Chul Chung
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
article

Testing the effect of the progenitor metallicity on the 56 Ni mass and constraining the progenitor scenarios in Type Ia supernovae

Young-Lo Kim, Yong -Cheol Kim, Chul Chung
article en

Abstract

The analytical model found that the intrinsic variation in the initial metallicity of the Type Ia supernova (SN Ia) progenitor stars ( Z progenitor ) translates into a 25% variation in the synthesized 56 Ni mass, and therefore, into a difference of ∼0.2 mag in the observed peak luminosity of SNe Ia. Previous observational studies used the currently observed global gas-phase metallicity of host galaxies, instead of Z progenitor that was used in the model, and the studies showed a higher scatter in the 56 Ni mass measurements than the model prediction. We used Z progenitor of 34 normal SNe Ia and employed recent SN Ia explosion models with various configurations to cover the observed 56 Ni mass range. Unlike previous studies, which only used samples in the sub-solar range, our sample covers the Z progenitor range (1/3 Z ⊙ &lt; Z progenitor &lt; 3 Z ⊙ ), where most of the Z progenitor effect occurs. Linear regression returns a slope of 0.02 ± 0.03, which trend is opposite to that of the analytical model, but at at low statistical significance level. A comparison of our sample with SN Ia explosion models on the Z progenitor – 56 Ni mass diagram allowed us to constrain the progenitor scenarios. We also explored other chemical composition indicators, such as (Fe/H) progenitor and ( α /Fe) progenitor . For (Fe/H) progenitor , our sample follows the trend predicted by the analytical models, but at a low significance level (0.4 σ ). Noticeably, ( α /Fe) progenitor shows the opposite trend and a clear gap. When we split the sample at ( α /Fe) progenitor = 0.35( α /Fe) ⊙ , we find a 3 σ difference in the weighted means of the 56 Ni mass. Lastly, the standardized luminosities of SNe Ia in different Z progenitor groups differed by 0.14 ± 0.09 (1.6 σ ) mag. We highlight a holistic approach (from the progenitor star to the explosion with SN Ia and host galaxy observational data) to understanding the underlying physics of SNe Ia for a more accurate and precise cosmology.

Astronomy and AstrophysicsVol. 703
Yonsei University (KR), Galaxy Biotech (United States) (US)
National Research Foundation, National Research Foundation of Korea, Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.