Assessment of Erosion Risk in the Altınapa Dam Watershed Using a CRITIC-WASPAS Based Multi Criteria Decision Making Approach

This study aims to prioritize 13 sub-watersheds within the Altınapa Dam Basin, located in the Konya Closed Basin, based on their erosion risk levels. In the research, morphometric parameters derived from Digital Elevation Model (DEM) data were analysed and evaluated as decision-making criteria. The relative importance of each parameter was determined using the CRITIC approach, a statistically based objective weighting method. Subsequently, the erosion risk levels of the sub-watersheds were calculated using the WASPAS method, incorporating the weights obtained from the CRITIC analysis. The erosion assessment was conducted under three different lambda (λ) scenarios (0, 0.5, and 1), and Qi scores were computed for each sub-watershed to establish a risk-based ranking. According to the results, sub-watersheds AH-8, AH-11, and AH-13 consistently ranked in the “very high” risk class across all scenarios. These sub-watersheds exhibited prominent values in terms of slope, drainage density, and topographic complexity. In contrast, AH-2 and AH-6 were classified in the “very low” risk group. Although the WASPAS model demonstrated sensitivity to the λ parameter, the consistent ranking of high-risk sub-watersheds supported the method’s reliability. In conclusion, the integrated CRITIC-WASPAS approach provides an effective and applicable decision-support tool for erosion risk assessment based on morphometric data. The findings offer a scientific foundation for the development of sustainable watershed management practices and erosion control strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Anatolian Environmental and Animal Sciences
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35229/jaes.1755203
Primary Topic
Groundwater and Watershed Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of Erosion Risk in the Altınapa Dam Watershed Using a CRITIC-WASPAS Based Multi Criteria Decision Making Approach

İbrahim Dursun
Journal of Anatolian Environmental and Animal Sciences
Groundwater and Watershed Analysis
article

Assessment of Erosion Risk in the Altınapa Dam Watershed Using a CRITIC-WASPAS Based Multi Criteria Decision Making Approach

İbrahim Dursun
article en

Abstract

This study aims to prioritize 13 sub-watersheds within the Altınapa Dam Basin, located in the Konya Closed Basin, based on their erosion risk levels. In the research, morphometric parameters derived from Digital Elevation Model (DEM) data were analysed and evaluated as decision-making criteria. The relative importance of each parameter was determined using the CRITIC approach, a statistically based objective weighting method. Subsequently, the erosion risk levels of the sub-watersheds were calculated using the WASPAS method, incorporating the weights obtained from the CRITIC analysis. The erosion assessment was conducted under three different lambda (λ) scenarios (0, 0.5, and 1), and Qi scores were computed for each sub-watershed to establish a risk-based ranking. According to the results, sub-watersheds AH-8, AH-11, and AH-13 consistently ranked in the “very high” risk class across all scenarios. These sub-watersheds exhibited prominent values in terms of slope, drainage density, and topographic complexity. In contrast, AH-2 and AH-6 were classified in the “very low” risk group. Although the WASPAS model demonstrated sensitivity to the λ parameter, the consistent ranking of high-risk sub-watersheds supported the method’s reliability. In conclusion, the integrated CRITIC-WASPAS approach provides an effective and applicable decision-support tool for erosion risk assessment based on morphometric data. The findings offer a scientific foundation for the development of sustainable watershed management practices and erosion control strategies.

Journal of Anatolian Environmental and Animal SciencesVol. 10(5)
Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Groundwater and Watershed Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.