SPME/GC/Q-ToF-MS and Chemometric Approaches for Detecting Adulteration in Ground Roasted Coffee

In the world, adulteration of coffee might have been observed for years owing to dishonest food manufacturers. Today, various analytical methods have been used for food fraud detection. In the current research, the potential use of solid-phase microextraction (SPME)-gas chromatography-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC/Q-ToF-MS) combined with chemometrics was evaluated to detect coffee adulteration. The aroma profiles of ground roasted coffee were compared with some commonly used adulterants (ground roasted barley, corn and soybean). The SPME fiber assembly DVB/CAR/PDMS was utilized to collect and concentrate the headspace volatiles of ground roasted coffees and adulterants, and the volatile profile analyses were performed by GC/Q-ToF-MS. Non-adulterated and adulterated samples were accomplishedly separated after applying some chemometric tools (principal component analysis (PCA), partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) and hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA)) on the obtained chromatographic data. Two volatile compounds (1H-imidazole-4-methanol and benzene-2-(1,3-butadienyl)-1,3,5-trimethyl) were identified as potential markers for the determination of adulterants (ground roasted barley, corn or soybean) in ground roasted coffee (p-value cut-off<0.001 and fold change (FC) cut-off>10). Also, 2-furanmethanol and 2-formyl-1-methylprrrole were found as marker candidates for roasted coffee powder. This analytical method allowed the detection of selected herbal adulterants (5% w/w) found in ground coffee. Key words: Coffee adulteration; volatile profiles; SPME; GC/Q-ToF-MS; chemometrics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Coffee Science
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25186/.v20i.2362
Primary Topic
Coffee research and impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SPME/GC/Q-ToF-MS and Chemometric Approaches for Detecting Adulteration in Ground Roasted Coffee

Nurcan Ayşar Güzelsoy, Filiz Çavuş, Banu Akgün
Coffee Science
Coffee research and impacts
article

SPME/GC/Q-ToF-MS and Chemometric Approaches for Detecting Adulteration in Ground Roasted Coffee

Nurcan Ayşar Güzelsoy, Filiz Çavuş, Banu Akgün
article en

Abstract

In the world, adulteration of coffee might have been observed for years owing to dishonest food manufacturers. Today, various analytical methods have been used for food fraud detection. In the current research, the potential use of solid-phase microextraction (SPME)-gas chromatography-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC/Q-ToF-MS) combined with chemometrics was evaluated to detect coffee adulteration. The aroma profiles of ground roasted coffee were compared with some commonly used adulterants (ground roasted barley, corn and soybean). The SPME fiber assembly DVB/CAR/PDMS was utilized to collect and concentrate the headspace volatiles of ground roasted coffees and adulterants, and the volatile profile analyses were performed by GC/Q-ToF-MS. Non-adulterated and adulterated samples were accomplishedly separated after applying some chemometric tools (principal component analysis (PCA), partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) and hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA)) on the obtained chromatographic data. Two volatile compounds (1H-imidazole-4-methanol and benzene-2-(1,3-butadienyl)-1,3,5-trimethyl) were identified as potential markers for the determination of adulterants (ground roasted barley, corn or soybean) in ground roasted coffee (p-value cut-off<0.001 and fold change (FC) cut-off>10). Also, 2-furanmethanol and 2-formyl-1-methylprrrole were found as marker candidates for roasted coffee powder. This analytical method allowed the detection of selected herbal adulterants (5% w/w) found in ground coffee. Key words: Coffee adulteration; volatile profiles; SPME; GC/Q-ToF-MS; chemometrics.

Coffee ScienceVol. 20
Central Research Institute (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Coffee research and impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.