Legal Status Categorization, Transitions, Starting Points as Employment Stratifying Mechanisms: Evidence from US Student-Migrant-Workers

Legal status is increasingly recognized as a hierarchical axis of stratification shaping migrants’ access to employment and rights. The study reported herein examined how three facets of legal status—current categorization, transitions, and initial “starting points”—are associated with the employment conditions of student-migrant-workers (individuals who are on student visas and under post-graduation work permits). Using pooled National Survey of College Graduates (NSCG) data from 2015 to 2021, the analysis employed ordinary least squares and logistic regression models, supplemented by propensity score matching, to assess associations between these legal-status facets and annual earnings and four benefits: health insurance, pension plans, profit-sharing, and paid vacation. Findings show that current student-migrant-workers earned significantly less and had poorer benefit access than their comparable counterparts with temporary work visas, dependent visa, permanent residency, or naturalized citizenship. Transitions from student to other statuses (whether temporary, dependent, or permanent) are associated with improved employment conditions, though the extent varies by destination status. Even after becoming permanent, those who initially entered with student visas continued to earn less than those who initially entered with temporary work visas; this disparity narrows over time, but persists for decades. The study contributes evidence that legal-status categorization, transitions, and starting points operate as stratifying mechanisms of employment even among highly educated migrants.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Migration Review
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01979183251381263
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Migration and Labor Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Legal Status Categorization, Transitions, Starting Points as Employment Stratifying Mechanisms: Evidence from US Student-Migrant-Workers

Xiaochen Liang
2 citations
International Migration Review
Migration and Labor Dynamics
8.40
article

Legal Status Categorization, Transitions, Starting Points as Employment Stratifying Mechanisms: Evidence from US Student-Migrant-Workers

Xiaochen Liang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Legal status is increasingly recognized as a hierarchical axis of stratification shaping migrants’ access to employment and rights. The study reported herein examined how three facets of legal status—current categorization, transitions, and initial “starting points”—are associated with the employment conditions of student-migrant-workers (individuals who are on student visas and under post-graduation work permits). Using pooled National Survey of College Graduates (NSCG) data from 2015 to 2021, the analysis employed ordinary least squares and logistic regression models, supplemented by propensity score matching, to assess associations between these legal-status facets and annual earnings and four benefits: health insurance, pension plans, profit-sharing, and paid vacation. Findings show that current student-migrant-workers earned significantly less and had poorer benefit access than their comparable counterparts with temporary work visas, dependent visa, permanent residency, or naturalized citizenship. Transitions from student to other statuses (whether temporary, dependent, or permanent) are associated with improved employment conditions, though the extent varies by destination status. Even after becoming permanent, those who initially entered with student visas continued to earn less than those who initially entered with temporary work visas; this disparity narrows over time, but persists for decades. The study contributes evidence that legal-status categorization, transitions, and starting points operate as stratifying mechanisms of employment even among highly educated migrants.

International Migration Review
University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Migration and Labor Dynamics
8.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.