“I Won't Give up on My Rights Even If I Don't Get What I Deserve”: From Victimization to Resistance

Variations in help-seeking behaviors of domestic violence (DV) survivors have been extensively studied across contexts. Drawing on in-depth interviews with Iranian women who filed petitions against their abusive husbands, this study uses legal consciousness to examine survivors’ journeys in a theocratic and authoritarian context. It explores how survivors understand the role of law and how that understanding shapes their help-seeking strategies. The legal consciousness framework shows how restrictive gender norms initially position survivors “outside the law,” discouraging formal engagement. As their understandings of their experiences shift, they begin to see the law as a potential resource. Their legal engagement becomes more strategic as their legal consciousness evolves into a hybrid “with-and-against the law” stance, shaped by interactions with legal actors. This study contributes to feminist and sociolegal scholarship by deepening our understanding of the dynamics that shape survivors’ legal consciousness and legal mobilization in a theocratic and authoritarian setting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social & Legal Studies
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09646639251383060
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“I Won't Give up on My Rights Even If I Don't Get What I Deserve”: From Victimization to Resistance

Atieh Babakhani
Social & Legal Studies
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

“I Won't Give up on My Rights Even If I Don't Get What I Deserve”: From Victimization to Resistance

Atieh Babakhani
article en

Abstract

Variations in help-seeking behaviors of domestic violence (DV) survivors have been extensively studied across contexts. Drawing on in-depth interviews with Iranian women who filed petitions against their abusive husbands, this study uses legal consciousness to examine survivors’ journeys in a theocratic and authoritarian context. It explores how survivors understand the role of law and how that understanding shapes their help-seeking strategies. The legal consciousness framework shows how restrictive gender norms initially position survivors “outside the law,” discouraging formal engagement. As their understandings of their experiences shift, they begin to see the law as a potential resource. Their legal engagement becomes more strategic as their legal consciousness evolves into a hybrid “with-and-against the law” stance, shaped by interactions with legal actors. This study contributes to feminist and sociolegal scholarship by deepening our understanding of the dynamics that shape survivors’ legal consciousness and legal mobilization in a theocratic and authoritarian setting.

Social & Legal Studies
Ramapo College (US), The College of New Jersey (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.