The Role of Parenting Patterns, Parent Characteristics, and the Family Environment in Youth Internalizing and Externalizing: Evidence from the ABCD Study

BackgroundChildhood internalizing and externalizing behavior problems predict poor long-term mental health outcomes. Parenting is a key risk factor, yet prior research often focuses narrowly on single behaviors, overlooking how broader patterns of parenting that consider multiple behaviors (i.e., involvement, warmth, inconsistency, monitoring, and punishment) interact with parent/family characteristics to predict internalizing and externalizing. MethodsUsing data from the ABCD Study, we conducted latent profile analysis (LPA) using six parenting behaviors (involvement, positive parenting, inconsistent discipline, poor monitoring and supervision, corporal punishment, other punishment) to identify broad parenting patterns. Logistic regression models tested differences between profiles by parent/family characteristics. Linear regression models predicted youth internalizing and externalizing from parenting profile, parent psychopathology, and family characteristics across late childhood and early adolescence. ResultsLPA identified three parenting profiles (entropy 0.956-0.994). Profile 1 was characterized by the lowest involvement, warmth, and monitoring and the highest punishment and inconsistency; Profile 2 by moderate levels; and Profile 3 by the highest involvement, warmth, and monitoring and the lowest punishment and inconsistency. Profiles 1 and 2 were associated with higher parental psychopathology and poorer family environments. Regression models indicated that youth externalizing differed by parenting profile in childhood but not adolescence. Parent/family factors outside of parenting were the most robust predictors of youth behavior. ConclusionsFindings underscore the importance of the broader familial context when addressing youth behavior problems and suggest interventions may be more effective when tailored to these contextual factors.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/rbhdm_v1
Primary Topic
Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Role of Parenting Patterns, Parent Characteristics, and the Family Environment in Youth Internalizing and Externalizing: Evidence from the ABCD Study

Ami S. Ikeda, Yuk Fai Cheong, Hanan D. Trotman, Rohan H. C. Palmer et al.
Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
article

The Role of Parenting Patterns, Parent Characteristics, and the Family Environment in Youth Internalizing and Externalizing: Evidence from the ABCD Study

Ami S. Ikeda, Yuk Fai Cheong, Hanan D. Trotman, Rohan H. C. Palmer, Patricia A. Brennan, Emma Webster, Ariya Maskara
article en

Abstract

BackgroundChildhood internalizing and externalizing behavior problems predict poor long-term mental health outcomes. Parenting is a key risk factor, yet prior research often focuses narrowly on single behaviors, overlooking how broader patterns of parenting that consider multiple behaviors (i.e., involvement, warmth, inconsistency, monitoring, and punishment) interact with parent/family characteristics to predict internalizing and externalizing. MethodsUsing data from the ABCD Study, we conducted latent profile analysis (LPA) using six parenting behaviors (involvement, positive parenting, inconsistent discipline, poor monitoring and supervision, corporal punishment, other punishment) to identify broad parenting patterns. Logistic regression models tested differences between profiles by parent/family characteristics. Linear regression models predicted youth internalizing and externalizing from parenting profile, parent psychopathology, and family characteristics across late childhood and early adolescence. ResultsLPA identified three parenting profiles (entropy 0.956-0.994). Profile 1 was characterized by the lowest involvement, warmth, and monitoring and the highest punishment and inconsistency; Profile 2 by moderate levels; and Profile 3 by the highest involvement, warmth, and monitoring and the lowest punishment and inconsistency. Profiles 1 and 2 were associated with higher parental psychopathology and poorer family environments. Regression models indicated that youth externalizing differed by parenting profile in childhood but not adolescence. Parent/family factors outside of parenting were the most robust predictors of youth behavior. ConclusionsFindings underscore the importance of the broader familial context when addressing youth behavior problems and suggest interventions may be more effective when tailored to these contextual factors.

Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.