The impact of societal culture and organizational culture on nuclear safety culture: An analysis from the perspective of Hofstede’s cultural dimensions model

This study examines the interaction between societal culture and organizational culture, and investigates how this relationship shapes nuclear safety culture within the framework of Geert Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions Model. It underscores that societal culture is transmitted into organizational culture through individuals, thereby providing the foundational values upon which organizational norms and practices are built. Based on Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions Model, the study conducts a comparative analysis of five key dimensions of societal culture—power distance, uncertainty avoidance, individualism versus collectivism, masculinity versus femininity, and long-term versus short-term orientation—alongside the ten positive nuclear safety culture traits identified by the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO) and the World Association of Nuclear Operators (WANO). The findings reveal that cultural profiles characterized by low power distance, low uncertainty avoidance, individualism, masculinity, and long-term orientation tend to reinforce positive nuclear safety culture traits, particularly a questioning attitude, an environment for raising concerns, personal accountability, safety communication, and decision-making. Conversely, cultural patterns marked by high power distance, high uncertainty avoidance, collectivism, femininity, and short-term orientation may hinder the early identification of risks, constrain critical evaluation processes, and reduce the prioritization of safety, thereby failing to support positive traits—especially a questioning attitude, an environment for raising concerns, and personal accountability. In conclusion, the study affirms that the development and reinforcement of nuclear safety culture should give primary consideration to societal cultural factors. It further emphasizes that fostering a positive nuclear safety culture is a collective responsibility shared by all personnel, while leaders hold a pivotal role in shaping, guiding, and sustaining this culture over time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Energy Studies
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58559/ijes.1768056
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Safety Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The impact of societal culture and organizational culture on nuclear safety culture: An analysis from the perspective of Hofstede’s cultural dimensions model

Necati Yamaç
1 citations
International Journal of Energy Studies
Occupational Health and Safety Research
1.54
article

The impact of societal culture and organizational culture on nuclear safety culture: An analysis from the perspective of Hofstede’s cultural dimensions model

Necati Yamaç
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study examines the interaction between societal culture and organizational culture, and investigates how this relationship shapes nuclear safety culture within the framework of Geert Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions Model. It underscores that societal culture is transmitted into organizational culture through individuals, thereby providing the foundational values upon which organizational norms and practices are built. Based on Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions Model, the study conducts a comparative analysis of five key dimensions of societal culture—power distance, uncertainty avoidance, individualism versus collectivism, masculinity versus femininity, and long-term versus short-term orientation—alongside the ten positive nuclear safety culture traits identified by the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO) and the World Association of Nuclear Operators (WANO). The findings reveal that cultural profiles characterized by low power distance, low uncertainty avoidance, individualism, masculinity, and long-term orientation tend to reinforce positive nuclear safety culture traits, particularly a questioning attitude, an environment for raising concerns, personal accountability, safety communication, and decision-making. Conversely, cultural patterns marked by high power distance, high uncertainty avoidance, collectivism, femininity, and short-term orientation may hinder the early identification of risks, constrain critical evaluation processes, and reduce the prioritization of safety, thereby failing to support positive traits—especially a questioning attitude, an environment for raising concerns, and personal accountability. In conclusion, the study affirms that the development and reinforcement of nuclear safety culture should give primary consideration to societal cultural factors. It further emphasizes that fostering a positive nuclear safety culture is a collective responsibility shared by all personnel, while leaders hold a pivotal role in shaping, guiding, and sustaining this culture over time.

International Journal of Energy StudiesVol. 10(3)
Hacettepe University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Occupational Health and Safety Research
1.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.