Differences in hip and knee muscle strength between successful and unsuccessful performances of the single leg sit to stand test from a 20-cm-high box in healthy young adults

[Purpose] To investigate differences in knee and hip muscle strength between successful and unsuccessful single leg sit to stand tests from a 20-cm-high box (SLST 20) in healthy young adults. [Participants and Methods] Sixty-six lower limbs from 33 healthy adults (20 males, 13 females; mean age 25.4 ± 3.4 years) were classified into successful and unsuccessful groups. Isokinetic strength of the knee (flexion/extension at 60°/s) and hip (flexion/extension/abduction/adduction at 30°/s) was measured. Statistical analyses included t-tests, Kruskal-Wallis tests, and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) using sex as a covariate. Stratified analyses were also performed. [Results] The successful group had significantly greater strength in knee flexion/extension, hip flexion, and hip adduction. ANCOVA revealed that knee flexion and extension were significantly associated with SLST 20 performance, whereas hip strength was not, after adjusting for sex. Among females, hip adduction strength was significantly greater in the successful group, with no significant difference observed in males. [Conclusion] Knee strength is crucial for SLST 20 performance, and hip adduction strength may be important, particularly in females. Therefore, sex-specific assessments and training strategies should be considered in clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Physical Therapy Science
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.37.524
Primary Topic
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differences in hip and knee muscle strength between successful and unsuccessful performances of the single leg sit to stand test from a 20-cm-high box in healthy young adults

Akira Hosaka, Fumiko KAMIJO, Yoshinori Kagaya, Naoyuki Motojima et al.
Journal of Physical Therapy Science
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
article

Differences in hip and knee muscle strength between successful and unsuccessful performances of the single leg sit to stand test from a 20-cm-high box in healthy young adults

Akira Hosaka, Fumiko KAMIJO, Yoshinori Kagaya, Naoyuki Motojima, Minoru Daira, Hokuto Morohoshi
article en

Abstract

[Purpose] To investigate differences in knee and hip muscle strength between successful and unsuccessful single leg sit to stand tests from a 20-cm-high box (SLST 20) in healthy young adults. [Participants and Methods] Sixty-six lower limbs from 33 healthy adults (20 males, 13 females; mean age 25.4 ± 3.4 years) were classified into successful and unsuccessful groups. Isokinetic strength of the knee (flexion/extension at 60°/s) and hip (flexion/extension/abduction/adduction at 30°/s) was measured. Statistical analyses included t-tests, Kruskal-Wallis tests, and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) using sex as a covariate. Stratified analyses were also performed. [Results] The successful group had significantly greater strength in knee flexion/extension, hip flexion, and hip adduction. ANCOVA revealed that knee flexion and extension were significantly associated with SLST 20 performance, whereas hip strength was not, after adjusting for sex. Among females, hip adduction strength was significantly greater in the successful group, with no significant difference observed in males. [Conclusion] Knee strength is crucial for SLST 20 performance, and hip adduction strength may be important, particularly in females. Therefore, sex-specific assessments and training strategies should be considered in clinical practice.

Journal of Physical Therapy ScienceVol. 37(10)
Tokai University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.