Test-retest reliability of a novel unilateral thoracic expansion measurement using stretchable strain sensors

[Purpose] We report here a new method for measuring unilateral thoracic expansion using stretchable strain sensors. In this study, we assessed the test-retest reliability of this method and compared left and right thoracic expansions in healthy males. [Participants and Methods] Thirty healthy males (mean age, 30.1 ± 7.4 years) participated in this study. Two strain sensors were placed on the lateral walls of the thorax at xiphoid process level. Participants were asked to take three deep breaths, and the change in sensor length from the position at maximal expiration to that at maximal inspiration was recorded. These measurements were simultaneously performed on left and right sides. Unilateral thoracic expansions were calculated to assess differences between the maximal expiratory and inspiratory positions for each deep breath. The test-retest reliability of the unilateral thoracic expansion was then examined. [Results] Test reliability was excellent for both first and second datasets. Retest reliability was also excellent. The minimum detectable change (MDC) in the retest was 3.31 mm. [Conclusion] This newly developed method for measuring thoracic expansion is sufficiently reliable. No differences in thoracic expansion were observed between left and right sides in healthy males.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Physical Therapy Science
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.37.519
Primary Topic
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Test-retest reliability of a novel unilateral thoracic expansion measurement using stretchable strain sensors

Keiji Asada, M. Yamanaka, Kazuki Yamaguchi
Journal of Physical Therapy Science
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
article

Test-retest reliability of a novel unilateral thoracic expansion measurement using stretchable strain sensors

Keiji Asada, M. Yamanaka, Kazuki Yamaguchi
article en

Abstract

[Purpose] We report here a new method for measuring unilateral thoracic expansion using stretchable strain sensors. In this study, we assessed the test-retest reliability of this method and compared left and right thoracic expansions in healthy males. [Participants and Methods] Thirty healthy males (mean age, 30.1 ± 7.4 years) participated in this study. Two strain sensors were placed on the lateral walls of the thorax at xiphoid process level. Participants were asked to take three deep breaths, and the change in sensor length from the position at maximal expiration to that at maximal inspiration was recorded. These measurements were simultaneously performed on left and right sides. Unilateral thoracic expansions were calculated to assess differences between the maximal expiratory and inspiratory positions for each deep breath. The test-retest reliability of the unilateral thoracic expansion was then examined. [Results] Test reliability was excellent for both first and second datasets. Retest reliability was also excellent. The minimum detectable change (MDC) in the retest was 3.31 mm. [Conclusion] This newly developed method for measuring thoracic expansion is sufficiently reliable. No differences in thoracic expansion were observed between left and right sides in healthy males.

Journal of Physical Therapy ScienceVol. 37(10)
Suzuka University of Medical Science (JP), Maruyama Memorial General Hospital (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.