STUDY ON TRENDS OF CONTEMPORARY ASIAN ARCHITECTURAL THOUGHT BY DISCOURSES OF ARCASIA

This study analyzes trends in contemporary Asian architectural thought through the discourse of ARCASIA from 1984 to 2021, examining statistics, characteristics, and processes through a review of keynotes in Asian Congress of Architects of ARCASIA. The conclusions are: First, ARCASIA’s discourse has become decentralized and diverse over time. Second, “reflection on modernism,” “region & context,” and “nature & environment” have emerged as key characteristics. Third, four stages of I (1984~1992), II (1993~2003), III (2004~2011), and IV (2012~2021) can be identified. Overall, the thematic transitions in ARCASIA’s discourses emphasize the expression of self-identity in architecture within the Asian context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ)
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3130/aija.90.2325
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Architecture and Cultural Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.27
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

STUDY ON TRENDS OF CONTEMPORARY ASIAN ARCHITECTURAL THOUGHT BY DISCOURSES OF ARCASIA

Dukwoo KIM, Shigeki Matsubara, Mina KOJIMA, Yiwen Zhang et al.
1 citations
Journal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ)
Architecture and Cultural Influences
8.27
article

STUDY ON TRENDS OF CONTEMPORARY ASIAN ARCHITECTURAL THOUGHT BY DISCOURSES OF ARCASIA

Dukwoo KIM, Shigeki Matsubara, Mina KOJIMA, Yiwen Zhang, Michihiro Kita
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study analyzes trends in contemporary Asian architectural thought through the discourse of ARCASIA from 1984 to 2021, examining statistics, characteristics, and processes through a review of keynotes in Asian Congress of Architects of ARCASIA. The conclusions are: First, ARCASIA’s discourse has become decentralized and diverse over time. Second, “reflection on modernism,” “region & context,” and “nature & environment” have emerged as key characteristics. Third, four stages of I (1984~1992), II (1993~2003), III (2004~2011), and IV (2012~2021) can be identified. Overall, the thematic transitions in ARCASIA’s discourses emphasize the expression of self-identity in architecture within the Asian context.

Journal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ)Vol. 90(836)
Fukuyama City University (JP), The University of Osaka (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Architecture and Cultural Influences
8.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.