Forced Migration as Nation-Building: The League of Nations, Minority Protection, and the Greek-Turkish Population Exchange

Although the two League of Nations projects worked at cross purposes, both aimed to accomplish the same objective: protecting minorities in the lands of the recently defeated Ottoman Empire. The provisions for protecting minorities that were included in the peace treaty with Turkey in July 1923 sought to guarantee special rights to religious, linguistic, and national minorities in former Ottoman territories. On the other hand, the Convention for the Exchange of Populations, signed in January 1923, called for the expulsion of minorities and the expropriation of their properties. The minority-protection provisions in the peace treaty and the forcible expulsions envisioned in the accompanying convention were obviously inconsistent solutions to the ‘problem of minorities’, and the juxtaposition of the two efforts is striking. Nonetheless, the paradoxical new legal arrangements belie an underlying consistency: both measures created the conditions for the new political institutions required by an emerging international consensus on proper political organisation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/4dqh-zh05
Primary Topic
Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Forced Migration as Nation-Building: The League of Nations, Minority Protection, and the Greek-Turkish Population Exchange

Sarah D. Shields
UNC Libraries
Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics
article

Forced Migration as Nation-Building: The League of Nations, Minority Protection, and the Greek-Turkish Population Exchange

Sarah D. Shields
article en

Abstract

Although the two League of Nations projects worked at cross purposes, both aimed to accomplish the same objective: protecting minorities in the lands of the recently defeated Ottoman Empire. The provisions for protecting minorities that were included in the peace treaty with Turkey in July 1923 sought to guarantee special rights to religious, linguistic, and national minorities in former Ottoman territories. On the other hand, the Convention for the Exchange of Populations, signed in January 1923, called for the expulsion of minorities and the expropriation of their properties. The minority-protection provisions in the peace treaty and the forcible expulsions envisioned in the accompanying convention were obviously inconsistent solutions to the ‘problem of minorities’, and the juxtaposition of the two efforts is striking. Nonetheless, the paradoxical new legal arrangements belie an underlying consistency: both measures created the conditions for the new political institutions required by an emerging international consensus on proper political organisation.

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.