Filling the Network Gap in Research Ethics: Analyzing Ethical Issues at Scale in Big Team Science

Scientific research increasingly involves large, multidisciplinary teams networked across multiple institutions to develop new technologies. Despite the rise of complex research networks and big team science, there has been little analysis to date of the ethical challenges facing these networks. The extensive literature on the ethical issues confronting individual researchers and small teams (the micro level) and on the larger societal challenges flowing from research and new technology (the macro level) leave a troubling gap in between, at the meso level of the research network involved in big team science. Yet the ability of complex networks to conduct research ethically – which is essential if the results are to be deemed reliable and trustworthy – depends on recognizing the ethical issues that emerge at this intermediate network level, identifying the values that should guide networks in addressing those issues, and equipping research leaders to build a culture supporting the ethical conduct of research across the laboratories and institutions that comprise the network. This paper calls out the problem, analyzing the gap and recommending next steps.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/rc4hw_v1
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Filling the Network Gap in Research Ethics: Analyzing Ethical Issues at Scale in Big Team Science

Terrence R. Tiersch, Susan M. Wolf, Paul Thompson, James F. Childress et al.
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

Filling the Network Gap in Research Ethics: Analyzing Ethical Issues at Scale in Big Team Science

Terrence R. Tiersch, Susan M. Wolf, Paul Thompson, James F. Childress, Timothy L. Pruett, Shawneequa Callier, Korkut Uygun, Alexander Morgan Capron, Rosario Isasi, Evelyn Brister, Kenneth A. Oye, Adam J. Koch, Gillian Roehrig, Andrew Maynard, Claire Colby McVan
article en

Abstract

Scientific research increasingly involves large, multidisciplinary teams networked across multiple institutions to develop new technologies. Despite the rise of complex research networks and big team science, there has been little analysis to date of the ethical challenges facing these networks. The extensive literature on the ethical issues confronting individual researchers and small teams (the micro level) and on the larger societal challenges flowing from research and new technology (the macro level) leave a troubling gap in between, at the meso level of the research network involved in big team science. Yet the ability of complex networks to conduct research ethically – which is essential if the results are to be deemed reliable and trustworthy – depends on recognizing the ethical issues that emerge at this intermediate network level, identifying the values that should guide networks in addressing those issues, and equipping research leaders to build a culture supporting the ethical conduct of research across the laboratories and institutions that comprise the network. This paper calls out the problem, analyzing the gap and recommending next steps.

Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Filling the Network Gap in Research Ethics: Analyzing Ethical Issues at Scale in Big Team Science — Terrence R. Tiersch, Susan M. Wolf, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS