Evaluation of a Smartphone-Based Caries Detection App in Rural Dental Camps

Aim: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and feasibility of a smartphone-based caries detection application in rural dental camps, comparing its performance against clinical and radiographic standards. Methodology: A prospective diagnostic-accuracy study was conducted across 12 rural camps, enrolling 582 participants (≥5 years). Standardized intraoral images were analyzed by the app’s AI model and compared with ICDAS-based examinations by calibrated dentists. Results: The app's overall accuracy was 85.4%, its per-tooth sensitivity was 87.2%, its specificity was 83.1%, and it had a significant agreement (κ=0.72) with clinicians. Occlusal caries performed better (90.3%) than proximal (78.9%), and the feasibility results showed few problems with connectivity and image rejection. Conclusion: The smartphone app's potential for widespread caries screening in underserved rural areas was supported by its high diagnostic accuracy, quick processing, and strong agreement with clinical gold standards.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Carcinogenesis
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64149/j.carcinog.24.3.803-806
Primary Topic
Dental Research and COVID-19
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of a Smartphone-Based Caries Detection App in Rural Dental Camps

Journal of Carcinogenesis
Dental Research and COVID-19
article

Evaluation of a Smartphone-Based Caries Detection App in Rural Dental Camps

article en

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and feasibility of a smartphone-based caries detection application in rural dental camps, comparing its performance against clinical and radiographic standards. Methodology: A prospective diagnostic-accuracy study was conducted across 12 rural camps, enrolling 582 participants (≥5 years). Standardized intraoral images were analyzed by the app’s AI model and compared with ICDAS-based examinations by calibrated dentists. Results: The app's overall accuracy was 85.4%, its per-tooth sensitivity was 87.2%, its specificity was 83.1%, and it had a significant agreement (κ=0.72) with clinicians. Occlusal caries performed better (90.3%) than proximal (78.9%), and the feasibility results showed few problems with connectivity and image rejection. Conclusion: The smartphone app's potential for widespread caries screening in underserved rural areas was supported by its high diagnostic accuracy, quick processing, and strong agreement with clinical gold standards.

Journal of CarcinogenesisVol. 24(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Dental Research and COVID-19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.