Çoklu Sınıflandırma Problemlerinde Kullanılan Bazı Performans Ölçütlerinin Karşılaştırılması

The purpose of this research is to compare the performance metrics used in multiple classification problems in machine learning. For this purpose, simulation study was carried out under different scenarios by using 4 different classification methods and the performance metrics obtained were compared in this direction. While comparing the performance metrics in the study, the data to be used for classification purposes were derived under different scenarios, taking into account the effect of 4 factors. 90 different scenarios were created by considering the number of 3 different categories of the response variable, 5 different sample sizes, 3 different correlation structures, and the balanced and unbalanced distribution of the response variable. Accuray, Kappa and CramerV metrics used in multiple classification problems were used as performance measures. Changes in performance metrics in the determined scenarios are summarized in tables and compared. As a result of the comparisons made with the simulation study, it has been seen that Kappa performance measure is a more accurate performance metric than the other two metrics in multi-class classification problems, and the method gives more reliable information about the classification success.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
DergiPark (Istanbul University)
Published
2024-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21180/iibfdkastamonu.1561910
Primary Topic
Face and Expression Recognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Çoklu Sınıflandırma Problemlerinde Kullanılan Bazı Performans Ölçütlerinin Karşılaştırılması

Cengiz Bal, Ali Vasfi Ağlarcı
DergiPark (Istanbul University)
Face and Expression Recognition
article

Çoklu Sınıflandırma Problemlerinde Kullanılan Bazı Performans Ölçütlerinin Karşılaştırılması

Cengiz Bal, Ali Vasfi Ağlarcı
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to compare the performance metrics used in multiple classification problems in machine learning. For this purpose, simulation study was carried out under different scenarios by using 4 different classification methods and the performance metrics obtained were compared in this direction. While comparing the performance metrics in the study, the data to be used for classification purposes were derived under different scenarios, taking into account the effect of 4 factors. 90 different scenarios were created by considering the number of 3 different categories of the response variable, 5 different sample sizes, 3 different correlation structures, and the balanced and unbalanced distribution of the response variable. Accuray, Kappa and CramerV metrics used in multiple classification problems were used as performance measures. Changes in performance metrics in the determined scenarios are summarized in tables and compared. As a result of the comparisons made with the simulation study, it has been seen that Kappa performance measure is a more accurate performance metric than the other two metrics in multi-class classification problems, and the method gives more reliable information about the classification success.

DergiPark (Istanbul University)
Eskişehir Osmangazi University (TR), Kastamonu University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Face and Expression Recognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Çoklu Sınıflandırma Problemlerinde Kullanılan Bazı Performans Ölçütlerinin Karşılaştırılması — Cengiz Bal, Ali Vasfi Ağlarcı · DergiPark (Istanbul University) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS