Is geothermal and biomass energy a better alternative for seven renewable energy courteous countries: Evidence from Fourier <scp>ARDL</scp> , Fourier <scp>B</scp> ootstrap <scp>T</scp> oda‐ <scp>Y</scp> amamoto and wavelet coherence

Abstract This study examines geothermal and biomass energy as cleaner alternatives in seven renewable‐focused countries in the context of sustainable development and global carbon‐neutrality objectives. Geothermal power provides significant emission reductions, with facilities around 99% less CO 2 and 97% less SO 2 compared to equivalent fossil‐fuel plants. Biomass energy is regarded as carbon‐neutral in CO 2 assessments; however, it still emits SO 2 and NO x . We utilize a Fourier‐augmented bootstrap ARDL model to examine long‐term energy‐emissions relationships, a Fourier‐augmented Toda‐Yamamoto causality test, and wavelet coherence for time‐frequency co‐movements. Research indicates validation of the Environmental Kuznets Curve in certain economies (USA, Italy), but not in others (France, Portugal, New Zealand, Turkey, Australia). France has no Environmental Kuznets Curve impact. Data from the EEA for Italy indicate the possible advantages; geothermal expansion from 2005 to 2018 averted approximately 2 Mt of CO 2 and reduced around 0.9 kt of NO x and 0.7 kt of SO 2 . Current business‐as‐usual predictions significantly exceed net‐zero objectives, with existing commitments anticipated to result in around 22 Gt CO 2 emissions by 2050. Conversely, IEA models anticipate over 90% renewable electricity by 2050, emphasizing the benefits of geothermal and biomass optimization. Essential policy recommendations for parallel economies encompass tripling clean energy investments by 2030, implementing robust carbon pricing and renewable mandates, and enhancing international collaboration on technology and finance. These actions would capitalize on geothermal and biomass potential to reduce emissions by the middle of the century. Renewable energy sources help reduce pollutant emissions, enhancing air quality and providing public health benefits.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.70090
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is geothermal and biomass energy a better alternative for seven renewable energy courteous countries: Evidence from Fourier ARDL , Fourier B ootstrap T oda‐ Y amamoto and wavelet coherence

Akanksha Singh, Magdalena Radulescu, Shweta Kumari, Shiv Lal
Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
article

Is geothermal and biomass energy a better alternative for seven renewable energy courteous countries: Evidence from Fourier ARDL , Fourier B ootstrap T oda‐ Y amamoto and wavelet coherence

Akanksha Singh, Magdalena Radulescu, Shweta Kumari, Shiv Lal
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study examines geothermal and biomass energy as cleaner alternatives in seven renewable‐focused countries in the context of sustainable development and global carbon‐neutrality objectives. Geothermal power provides significant emission reductions, with facilities around 99% less CO 2 and 97% less SO 2 compared to equivalent fossil‐fuel plants. Biomass energy is regarded as carbon‐neutral in CO 2 assessments; however, it still emits SO 2 and NO x . We utilize a Fourier‐augmented bootstrap ARDL model to examine long‐term energy‐emissions relationships, a Fourier‐augmented Toda‐Yamamoto causality test, and wavelet coherence for time‐frequency co‐movements. Research indicates validation of the Environmental Kuznets Curve in certain economies (USA, Italy), but not in others (France, Portugal, New Zealand, Turkey, Australia). France has no Environmental Kuznets Curve impact. Data from the EEA for Italy indicate the possible advantages; geothermal expansion from 2005 to 2018 averted approximately 2 Mt of CO 2 and reduced around 0.9 kt of NO x and 0.7 kt of SO 2 . Current business‐as‐usual predictions significantly exceed net‐zero objectives, with existing commitments anticipated to result in around 22 Gt CO 2 emissions by 2050. Conversely, IEA models anticipate over 90% renewable electricity by 2050, emphasizing the benefits of geothermal and biomass optimization. Essential policy recommendations for parallel economies encompass tripling clean energy investments by 2030, implementing robust carbon pricing and renewable mandates, and enhancing international collaboration on technology and finance. These actions would capitalize on geothermal and biomass potential to reduce emissions by the middle of the century. Renewable energy sources help reduce pollutant emissions, enhancing air quality and providing public health benefits.

Environmental Progress & Sustainable EnergyVol. 44(6)
University of Delhi (IN), Rajasthan Technical University (IN), Azerbaijan State University of Economics (AZ), Baku Engineering University (AZ), Universitatea Națională de Știință și Tehnologie Politehnica București (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.