Dilemmas in embodied methods: Towards holistic description in qualitative research

Our bodily experience is a recognised conduit to understanding our social world and those who dwell within it. Concurrently, embodied research emerged as a legitimate and thought-provoking methodological approach that goes further to access depth in understanding than more distanced approaches. Yet such methods imply a closeness with the participants and context that raises some philosophical and ethical dilemmas. This paper aims to engage with these debates using examples from the author's experiences conducting embodied research in various global locales in the broad field of sport and physical culture. A conceptual model is built and employed in these discussions, and in doing so, the concept of ‘holistic description’ is developed to highlight the potential of embodied methodologies to engender further trust between the researcher, the reader and participants. It is hoped these developments will embolden researchers thinking about embodied research with further confidence and knowledge to pursue such involved and empathetic routes to knowing while staying true to the fundamental principles of qualitative enquiry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Qualitative Research
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941251377267
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Participatory Visual Research Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dilemmas in embodied methods: Towards holistic description in qualitative research

Stephen Sheps, Jack Thomas Sugden
1 citations
Qualitative Research
Participatory Visual Research Methods
4.20
article

Dilemmas in embodied methods: Towards holistic description in qualitative research

Stephen Sheps, Jack Thomas Sugden
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Our bodily experience is a recognised conduit to understanding our social world and those who dwell within it. Concurrently, embodied research emerged as a legitimate and thought-provoking methodological approach that goes further to access depth in understanding than more distanced approaches. Yet such methods imply a closeness with the participants and context that raises some philosophical and ethical dilemmas. This paper aims to engage with these debates using examples from the author's experiences conducting embodied research in various global locales in the broad field of sport and physical culture. A conceptual model is built and employed in these discussions, and in doing so, the concept of ‘holistic description’ is developed to highlight the potential of embodied methodologies to engender further trust between the researcher, the reader and participants. It is hoped these developments will embolden researchers thinking about embodied research with further confidence and knowledge to pursue such involved and empathetic routes to knowing while staying true to the fundamental principles of qualitative enquiry.

Qualitative ResearchVol. 26(1)
Toronto Metropolitan University (CA), Liverpool John Moores University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Participatory Visual Research Methods
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Dilemmas in embodied methods: Towards holistic description in qualitative research — Stephen Sheps, Jack Thomas Sugden · Qualitative Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS