The Archiving Film: A Pharmacology of the Media Flux

By analyzing films assembled from images from the media flux, this article aims to explore a poetics of what we shall call the archiving film. We argue that such a cinema may be a pharmacological politics of memory, since it archives the ephemeral, often repressed or overlooked images of an operational flux, freeing their potentiality as cultural artefacts. From Walter Benjamin’s view that history belongs to the oppressed, to Foucault’s study of panopticism and Agamben’s poetics of inoperability, we propose to trace the artistic and epistemological value of the archiving film, focusing on an awareness of selectivity and transfiguration on part of the filmmakers. The chosen filmography marks a shift in relation to images from the flux: from a paradigmatic, descriptive state of contemplation (as in Michael Klier’s Der Riese from 1983, comprised of footage from the first CCTV cameras installed in West Germany), to a later syntagmatic turn (in Dragonfly Eyes from 2017, Xu Bing uses extensive hours of surveillance footage from mainland China to create a metafictional narrative). With the advent of desktop cinema and machinima, the hybridization of an archiving cinema thus escapes an analytic scheme set on binary oppositions, including that between author and spectator.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Doctoral Horizons
Published
2025-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37130/drhvol6iss1pp9-32
Primary Topic
Digital Education and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Archiving Film: A Pharmacology of the Media Flux

Mihai Ghiță
Doctoral Horizons
Digital Education and Society
article

The Archiving Film: A Pharmacology of the Media Flux

Mihai Ghiță
article en

Abstract

By analyzing films assembled from images from the media flux, this article aims to explore a poetics of what we shall call the archiving film. We argue that such a cinema may be a pharmacological politics of memory, since it archives the ephemeral, often repressed or overlooked images of an operational flux, freeing their potentiality as cultural artefacts. From Walter Benjamin’s view that history belongs to the oppressed, to Foucault’s study of panopticism and Agamben’s poetics of inoperability, we propose to trace the artistic and epistemological value of the archiving film, focusing on an awareness of selectivity and transfiguration on part of the filmmakers. The chosen filmography marks a shift in relation to images from the flux: from a paradigmatic, descriptive state of contemplation (as in Michael Klier’s Der Riese from 1983, comprised of footage from the first CCTV cameras installed in West Germany), to a later syntagmatic turn (in Dragonfly Eyes from 2017, Xu Bing uses extensive hours of surveillance footage from mainland China to create a metafictional narrative). With the advent of desktop cinema and machinima, the hybridization of an archiving cinema thus escapes an analytic scheme set on binary oppositions, including that between author and spectator.

Doctoral HorizonsVol. 6(1)
Babeș-Bolyai University (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Digital Education and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Archiving Film: A Pharmacology of the Media Flux — Mihai Ghiță · Doctoral Horizons (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS