An intelligent community-based system for healthcare prioritisation

Healthcare rationing is unavoidable in systems constrained by limited resources. While decisions about who should be treated are ethically complex, they must reflect not only efficiency concerns but also socially accepted values. This study aims to develop a multi-criteria decision-support system - Vital Priority System, that prioritise patients using a Random Forest algorithm trained on multiple rationing criteria endorsed by Portuguese civil society. Based on a Portuguese online survey data, the model incorporates nine dimensions: clinical need, life expectancy gain, quality of life improvement, age, waiting time, parental status, lifestyle responsibility, and social role. Our results show that clinical need, expected treatment effectiveness, waiting time and age were the most influential, followed by parental status. Lifestyle and social role factors were least weighted. The proposed system enables the classification of patients as 'priority' or 'non-priority', providing healthcare professionals with a transparent, consistent, and ethically grounded tool to support decision-making. This study advances the literature by operationalising, for the first time in the Portuguese context, public preferences in a replicable AI-based framework for fairer patient prioritisation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-14363-8
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Quality and Safety in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.53

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An intelligent community-based system for healthcare prioritisation

Fátima Leal, Micaela Pinho
1 citations
Scientific Reports
Quality and Safety in Healthcare
3.53
article

An intelligent community-based system for healthcare prioritisation

Fátima Leal, Micaela Pinho
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Healthcare rationing is unavoidable in systems constrained by limited resources. While decisions about who should be treated are ethically complex, they must reflect not only efficiency concerns but also socially accepted values. This study aims to develop a multi-criteria decision-support system - Vital Priority System, that prioritise patients using a Random Forest algorithm trained on multiple rationing criteria endorsed by Portuguese civil society. Based on a Portuguese online survey data, the model incorporates nine dimensions: clinical need, life expectancy gain, quality of life improvement, age, waiting time, parental status, lifestyle responsibility, and social role. Our results show that clinical need, expected treatment effectiveness, waiting time and age were the most influential, followed by parental status. Lifestyle and social role factors were least weighted. The proposed system enables the classification of patients as 'priority' or 'non-priority', providing healthcare professionals with a transparent, consistent, and ethically grounded tool to support decision-making. This study advances the literature by operationalising, for the first time in the Portuguese context, public preferences in a replicable AI-based framework for fairer patient prioritisation.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Universidade Portucalense (PT), University of Aveiro (PT)
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Quality and Safety in Healthcare
3.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

An intelligent community-based system for healthcare prioritisation — Fátima Leal, Micaela Pinho · Scientific Reports (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS