Claims of the tax authority against businesses for invalidation of transactions to exclude VAT and CIT offcets

The article analyzes the claims of the tax authorities of the Republic of Kazakhstan against businesses concerning the invalidation of transactions for the purpose of excluding VAT and CIT offsets. It outlines the legal framework used by the tax authorities to justify their claims, including civil and tax legislation, and explores the most common procedural and evidentiary issues. Particular attention is paid to the role of the Electronic Invoice Information System (ESF IS), which allows tax authorities to monitor and challenge business transactions remotely. The author highlights both the risks posed by such claims to the investment climate and the frequent legal shortcomings in the tax authorities’ arguments. The article also provides practical recommendations and defense strategies for businesses to resist unfounded tax claims, including the collection of documentary evidence, witness testimonies, and a clear legal position. The importance of distinguishing tax law violations from civil law obligations is emphasized. The conclusions contribute to improving legal awareness among businesses and strengthening the protection of taxpayer rights.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Eurasian Scientific Journal of Law
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46914/2959-4197-2025-1-3-17-26
Primary Topic
Taxation and Legal Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Claims of the tax authority against businesses for invalidation of transactions to exclude VAT and CIT offcets

O. N. Safonova
Eurasian Scientific Journal of Law
Taxation and Legal Issues
article

Claims of the tax authority against businesses for invalidation of transactions to exclude VAT and CIT offcets

O. N. Safonova
article en

Abstract

The article analyzes the claims of the tax authorities of the Republic of Kazakhstan against businesses concerning the invalidation of transactions for the purpose of excluding VAT and CIT offsets. It outlines the legal framework used by the tax authorities to justify their claims, including civil and tax legislation, and explores the most common procedural and evidentiary issues. Particular attention is paid to the role of the Electronic Invoice Information System (ESF IS), which allows tax authorities to monitor and challenge business transactions remotely. The author highlights both the risks posed by such claims to the investment climate and the frequent legal shortcomings in the tax authorities’ arguments. The article also provides practical recommendations and defense strategies for businesses to resist unfounded tax claims, including the collection of documentary evidence, witness testimonies, and a clear legal position. The importance of distinguishing tax law violations from civil law obligations is emphasized. The conclusions contribute to improving legal awareness among businesses and strengthening the protection of taxpayer rights.

Eurasian Scientific Journal of Law(3(12))
Turan University (KZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Taxation and Legal Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.